b stack radar

actiTIME vs Everhour: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of actiTIME and Everhour to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

A

actiTIME

6.3/10

actiTIME is time-tracking and project-cost software for small and mid-sized teams. It tracks billable hours, task progress, budgets, and leave, and is available in the cloud or self-hosted.

Everhour logo

Everhour

7.1/10

Winner

Everhour is a time tracking tool for teams and agencies that adds timers, budgets, resource planning and invoicing to existing project management apps.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
A
actiTIME
Everhour logo
Everhour
Scores
Overall Rating6.3/107.1/10
Cost8/108/10
Ease of Use7/108/10
Analytics7/106/10
Customization6/105/10
Scalability6/106/10
Support7/108/10
Integration4/109/10
Security6/105/10
Pricing
Free planYesYes
Cheapest paid plan$5/user/mo
Online (41-200 users)
$9/user/mo
Team
Estimated cost for 10 users$60/mo
Online (1-40 users)
$85/mo
Team
Features
App integrations
Reporting
Task management
Time tracking
DashboardsNot listed
Kanban boardsNot listed
SchedulingNot listed
Task listsNot listed

actiTIME vs Everhour cost by team size

actiTIME and Everhour cost the same at 1 user; Everhour costs less at 5 users; actiTIME costs less from 10 to 25 users.

Team sizeactiTIMEEverhour
1 userFreeFreeFreeFree
5 users$30/moOnline (1-40 users)FreeFree
10 users$60/moOnline (1-40 users)$85/moTeam
25 users$150/moOnline (1-40 users)$213/moTeam
50 users$250/moOnline (41-200 users)Contact for pricing

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

A
Why choose actiTIME

  • Lower estimated cost for 10 users: $60/mo vs $85/mo
  • Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Customization score (6/10 vs 5/10)

Everhour logo
Why choose Everhour

  • Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 4/10)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 7/10)

Pros & Cons

A
actiTIME

Pros

  • Low per-user price, falling to 5 USD per user per month above 40 users, plus a free plan for up to 3 users.
  • Detailed billable and non-billable time tracking, with reports comparing actual time against estimates.
  • Can be self-hosted, with direct database access, for organisations that keep data on their own servers.
  • Pairs with actiPLANS for leave, PTO, and shift scheduling in a connected system.
  • Reviewers on Software Finder give ease of use and support high marks (about 9 out of 10).

Cons

  • Few native integrations: only QuickBooks, Zapier, the Chrome plugin, and actiPLANS are listed.
  • Reviewers describe the interface as dated and cluttered.
  • Task and project management is shallow compared with dedicated PM suites, and no Gantt view was found.
  • Invoicing and reporting have gaps, including no saved recurring invoice items, according to reviewers.
  • Self-hosted major upgrades cost the full original license price again.

Everhour logo
Everhour

Pros

  • More than 20 native integrations, including Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Jira and Linear, put a timer directly on tasks, and reviewers praise these integrations most.
  • A browser extension adds tracking to more than 20 other web apps, such as Figma, HubSpot and Zendesk.
  • Budgets with alerts, expense tracking and invoicing that syncs to QuickBooks, Xero or FreshBooks cover billable work end to end.
  • The Team plan costs 8.50 USD per seat per month on yearly billing, and the free plan covers up to 5 seats.
  • Reviewers often single out the customer support, and Everhour holds about a 4.8 out of 5 average across 139 SpotSaaS ratings.

Cons

  • It is not a standalone PM suite: it has no Gantt charts, docs or whiteboards.
  • The free plan has no integrations, which are the product's main value.
  • Paid plans require 5 seats and payment by card only, and unused time is not refunded when you cancel.
  • Its security documentation relies on AWS's SOC 2 compliance rather than its own report, and it does not run formal periodic risk assessments.
  • Some users report hours that failed to record, too many reminder alerts, and limited chart-style reporting.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Everhour scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 7.1/10 against 6.3/10 for actiTIME. The largest gap is in Integration: 4/10 for actiTIME and 9/10 for Everhour.

ActiTIME costs less for 10 users: about $60/mo on its Online (1-40 users) plan, against about $85/mo on its Team plan for Everhour, billed monthly.

Yes, both actiTIME and Everhour have a free plan.

Related Comparisons