b stack radar

Payhawk vs Procountor (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

Payhawk is our pick, scoring 7.1/10 against 6.2/10 for Procountor on our Finance Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (9/10 vs 7/10). Neither Payhawk nor Procountor lists a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

Payhawk logo

Payhawk

7.1/10

Winner

Payhawk is a modular spend management platform combining Visa corporate cards, expense claims, accounts payable, procurement and travel booking for mid-sized and multi-entity companies.

Procountor logo

Procountor

6.2/10

Finago Procountor is a browser-based Finnish financial management system covering invoicing, purchase invoices, bookkeeping and payroll for companies and their accounting offices.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Payhawk logo
Payhawk
Procountor logo
Procountor
Scores
Overall Rating7.1/106.2/10
Scalability8/107/10
Analytics5/105/10
Compliance8/107/10
Integration9/107/10
Security8/107/10
Support5/105/10
Cost4/105/10
Customization7/106/10
Ease of Use8/106/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid plan£149/mo
Growth programme (UK/EEA)
€4/mo
First
Estimated cost for 10 users£149/mo
Growth programme (UK/EEA)
€4/mo
First
Features
Payroll
Accountant Access
Accounts Payable
Expense Management
Corporate CardsNot listed
General LedgerNot listed
InvoicingNot listed
Multi-currencyNot listed
Multi-entity ConsolidationNot listed
Tax ComplianceNot listed

Payhawk vs Procountor cost by team size

Team sizePayhawkProcountor
1 user£149/moGrowth programme (UK/EEA)€4/moFirst
5 users£149/moGrowth programme (UK/EEA)€4/moFirst
10 users£149/moGrowth programme (UK/EEA)€4/moFirst
25 users$299/moTravel€4/moFirst
50 users$299/moTravel€4/moFirst

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Who Payhawk and Procountor suit

Payhawk fits mid-market better; Procountor fits small business better.

AudiencePayhawkProcountor
Small Business4/10There is a discounted Growth programme for UK and EEA firms under 10 staff, but it is capped and reviewers say the cost is high for small companies.8/10The low-cost First and Light packages and the browser interface suit small Finnish companies.
Mid-Market9/10Module pricing from several hundred dollars a month, plus multi-entity add-ons, targets companies that have outgrown simple expense apps.7/10The higher packages add more vouchers, payroll for up to 100 people, multi-level approvals and contract invoicing.
Accountants and BookkeepersNot rated8/10Accounting offices get free unlimited access, and the product is built around shared use with outside accountants.
Enterprise7/10It offers SAP, Oracle and Workday connectors, SSO, and PO matching, but very large enterprises may still need deeper procurement suites.Not rated
Finance Teams9/10It is built for controllers and CFO teams that need card controls, AP approvals and ERP sync in one place.Not rated
FreelancersNot rated6/10Solo entrepreneurs are offered a separate, simpler product, Procountor Solo.
Startups5/10The Growth plan and unlimited employee seats help, but annual contracts and the price floor are less startup-friendly than freemium rivals.Not rated

Which One Should You Choose?

Payhawk logo
Why choose Payhawk

  • Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for mid-market (9/10 vs 7/10)

Procountor logo
Why choose Procountor

  • Higher Cost score (5/10 vs 4/10)
  • Better fit for small business (8/10 vs 4/10)
  • Includes Payroll, which Payhawk lacks

Pros & Cons

Payhawk logo
Payhawk

Pros

  • Unlimited employee seats, card transactions and document processing in every module, so costs do not scale per employee.
  • Very broad native integration list, covering NetSuite, Sage Intacct, SAP, Dynamics, Xero, QuickBooks, DATEV and 30+ HR systems, plus a partner API and MCP connector.
  • Strong for multi-entity European groups, with regulated card issuing entities in the EEA, UK and US and balances in six currencies.
  • AP module includes 2- and 3-way PO matching, segregation-of-duties controls, and e-invoicing support for Peppol, KSeF, SDI and Finvoice.
  • Reviewers often say employees find receipt capture and expense submission in the mobile app quick and easy.

Cons

  • Trustpilot (2.8/5) and some G2 reviews describe mid-contract price increases, automatic renewals and difficult cancellations.
  • Several reviewers report slow or AI-first support, with replies taking days or weeks.
  • Annual pricing, unit fees for admin seats and cards, and add-on prices are not published, so you have to get a quote.
  • Initial setup of workflows, custom fields and integrations is described as complex, and some reviewers note sync errors with Xero and with foreign currency refunds.
  • It is not a general ledger or payroll system, so it needs a separate ERP or accounting package.

Procountor logo
Procountor

Pros

  • No per-user fees: the company and its accounting office can add unlimited users at no charge.
  • Seven packages let you start at 4 euros a month and move up as transaction volume grows.
  • Payroll, purchase invoice approval and invoicing are all in one Finnish-compliant system.
  • A documented REST API with OAuth2, webhooks and a free test environment, plus third-party connectors.

Cons

  • Prices rise steeply between packages, from 82.90 euros for Basic to 344.90 euros for Plus.
  • Every transaction counts as a voucher, so overage charges can add up quickly.
  • Built mainly for the Finnish market, with very few independent English-language reviews.
  • Contract and cancellation terms are not stated clearly on the pricing page.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Payhawk scores higher on our Finance Software criteria: 7.1/10 against 6.2/10 for Procountor. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 8/10 for Payhawk and 6/10 for Procountor.

No, neither Payhawk nor Procountor lists a free plan.

Procountor is the better fit for small business: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 4/10 for Payhawk.

Procountor has Payroll, which Payhawk lacks.

Related Comparisons