Everhour vs Hubstaff: Complete Comparison (2026)

Why choose Everhour

• Higher Support score (8/10 vs 4/10)
• Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 7/10)

Why choose Hubstaff

• Higher Scalability score (7/10 vs 6/10)
• Better fit for remote teams (9/10 vs 6/10)
• Better fit for enterprise (6/10 vs 4/10)

Everhour

Pros

• More than 20 native integrations, including Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Jira and Linear, put a timer directly on tasks, and reviewers praise these integrations most.
• A browser extension adds tracking to more than 20 other web apps, such as Figma, HubSpot and Zendesk.
• Budgets with alerts, expense tracking and invoicing that syncs to QuickBooks, Xero or FreshBooks cover billable work end to end.
• The Team plan costs 8.50 USD per seat per month on yearly billing, and the free plan covers up to 5 seats.
• Reviewers often single out the customer support, and Everhour holds about a 4.8 out of 5 average across 139 SpotSaaS ratings.

Cons

• It is not a standalone PM suite: it has no Gantt charts, docs or whiteboards.
• The free plan has no integrations, which are the product's main value.
• Paid plans require 5 seats and payment by card only, and unused time is not refunded when you cancel.
• Its security documentation relies on AWS's SOC 2 compliance rather than its own report, and it does not run formal periodic risk assessments.
• Some users report hours that failed to record, too many reminder alerts, and limited chart-style reporting.

Hubstaff

Pros

• Annual per-seat prices from 4.99 USD are low compared with most monitoring and time tracking suites.
• Reviewers say starting the timer and setting up the app is simple, and that accurate tracking makes client billing easier.
• Payments through Wise, PayPal, Payoneer and Deel connect tracked hours directly to payroll.
• GPS tracking with geofencing serves field teams that work across job sites.
• Hubstaff Tasks adds kanban boards, sprints, epics and a Gantt-style roadmap that tie into tracked time.

Cons

• Screenshots and activity scoring are seen by many reviewers as invasive and can hurt team trust.
• Idle detection can mark people inactive during meetings, reading or calls.
• Recurring complaints cover surprise annual renewals, add-on charges and refund refusals.
• Support gets poor marks. Starter is reported to be email-only with a target response time of two days or more.
• Integrations are gated by plan: none on Starter and one on Grow.