b stack radar

Asana vs IBM Targetprocess Comparison

Compare Asana vs IBM Targetprocess features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

Asana logo

Asana

6.9/10

Winner

Work management platform for teams to plan projects, assign tasks, automate workflows, and track goals and portfolios, with AI agents on paid plans.

IBM Targetprocess logo

IBM Targetprocess

6.6/10

IBM Targetprocess is an enterprise agile and strategic portfolio management platform that links company strategy, funding and team delivery work across Agile, SAFe and hybrid teams.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Asana logo
Asana
IBM Targetprocess logo
IBM Targetprocess
Scores
Overall Rating6.9/106.6/10
Scalability8/109/10
Security8/107/10
Analytics7/107/10
Cost4/104/10
Customization7/109/10
Ease of Use8/105/10
Integration8/107/10
Support6/106/10
Pricing
Free planYesNo
Cheapest paid plan$13/user/mo
Starter
Contact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 users$135/mo
Starter
Contact for pricing
Features
App integrations
Collaboration tools
Dashboards
Goals and OKRs
Kanban boards
Reporting
Task management
Timeline view
Workflow automation
Client collaborationNot listed
Gantt chartsNot listed
SchedulingNot listed
Task listsNot listed
Time trackingNot listed

Asana vs IBM Targetprocess cost by team size

Team sizeAsanaIBM Targetprocess
1 userFreePersonalContact for pricing
5 users$67/moStarterContact for pricing
10 users$135/moStarterContact for pricing
25 users$337/moStarterContact for pricing
50 users$675/moStarterContact for pricing

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Asana logo
Why choose Asana

  • Has a free plan (IBM Targetprocess does not)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Security score (8/10 vs 7/10)
  • Better fit for freelancers (5/10 vs 1/10)
  • Better fit for startups (6/10 vs 3/10)

IBM Targetprocess logo
Why choose IBM Targetprocess

  • Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Higher Scalability score (9/10 vs 8/10)

Pros & Cons

Asana logo
Asana

Pros

  • Starter includes unlimited automations, forms, and timeline views, which covers most team project needs without upgrading to Advanced.
  • Unlimited free guests on paid plans let teams bring in clients and contractors without buying extra seats.
  • Advanced connects to Salesforce, Tableau, and Power BI, so project data can feed existing reporting tools.
  • Enterprise+ offers data residency, SIEM integration, and audit logs for regulated organisations.
  • Reviews are consistently high, with Capterra showing 4.5 from more than 13,000 reviews.

Cons

  • The free Personal plan now allows only 2 users, so most teams have to pay from the start.
  • Portfolios, goals, and time tracking are only on Advanced, which costs more than double the Starter price.
  • Seats are sold in blocks of 5, 10, 25, or 50 as teams grow, and AWS Marketplace reviewers have criticized these rigid user blocks.
  • AI usage beyond the included allowances is billed per request, which makes costs harder to predict.
  • A critical Gartner review from 2026 cited high enterprise pricing and limited workflow customization.

IBM Targetprocess logo
IBM Targetprocess

Pros

  • Highly configurable boards, workflows and views, which reviewers repeatedly credit as its main strength.
  • Connects team-level work to strategic objectives and investment decisions, which most task-focused project tools cannot do.
  • Supports Scrum, Kanban, SAFe and traditional methods side by side, which helps organisations in transition.
  • Works as a portfolio layer over Jira and Azure DevOps, so delivery teams can keep their existing tools.
  • Analyst recognition, including a Strong Performer rating in The Forrester Wave for Strategic Portfolio Management Tools, Q2 2026.

Cons

  • Reviewers report a steep learning curve and difficult initial setup and navigation.
  • No public pricing, and comparison articles say it is costly for small teams.
  • Forecasting and burndown accuracy depend on heavy, disciplined data entry.
  • Some users report limited integrations beyond the core tools, and say moving or exporting data takes manual effort.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Asana scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 6.9/10 against 6.6/10 for IBM Targetprocess. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 8/10 for Asana and 5/10 for IBM Targetprocess.

Asana has a free plan; IBM Targetprocess does not list one.

Asana is the better fit for freelancers: we rate it 5/10 for them, against 1/10 for IBM Targetprocess.

Related Comparisons