b stack radar

Agiled vs Scoro: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of Agiled and Scoro to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

Agiled logo

Agiled

6.3/10

Agiled is an all-in-one business platform for service businesses and agencies. It combines projects, CRM, invoicing, time tracking, and a client portal.

Scoro logo

Scoro

6.3/10

Modular professional services automation platform for agencies and consultancies that links CRM, quoting, projects, resource planning, time tracking and invoicing.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Agiled logo
Agiled
Scoro logo
Scoro
Scores
Overall Rating6.3/106.3/10
Customization6/107/10
Analytics5/108/10
Integration7/107/10
Support7/105/10
Ease of Use7/106/10
Security5/108/10
Cost7/104/10
Scalability5/107/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricing$17/user/mo
Time-billing
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricing$170/mo
Time-billing
Features
Scheduling
DocsNot listed
Client collaboration
App integrations
Task lists
Gantt charts
Task management
Time tracking
Workflow automation
Kanban boards
Reporting
Timeline viewNot listed
DashboardsNot listed
Goals and OKRsNot listed

Which One Should You Choose?

Agiled logo
Why choose Agiled

  • Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 4/10)
  • Higher Support score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for freelancers (8/10 vs 2/10)
  • Better fit for small business (8/10 vs 5/10)

Scoro logo
Why choose Scoro

  • Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Security score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for mid-market (8/10 vs 3/10)
  • Better fit for enterprise (6/10 vs 3/10)

Pros & Cons

Agiled logo
Agiled

Pros

  • Combines CRM, projects, invoicing, proposals, and a client portal, so small service firms can replace several separate tools.
  • Tracked time on tasks can be turned straight into client invoices.
  • Clients and contacts do not count toward seat limits, which keeps costs down for client-facing teams.
  • Strong user ratings: 4.8 from 83 reviews on SoftwareFinder and about 4.7 on G2, according to the vendor.
  • Projects can be viewed as kanban boards, lists, or Gantt charts.

Cons

  • Reviewers report a learning curve because of the number of modules, along with thin documentation and training material.
  • The mobile app and some translations are described as needing improvement.
  • Users ask for workload management and more flexible reporting.
  • Branding the client portal on lower plans costs extra.
  • Monthly-billing prices are not shown on the pricing page.

Scoro logo
Scoro

Pros

  • Covers the full service-delivery cycle (CRM, quotes, projects, time, resourcing, bills and invoices) in one data model, so margin reports by client, project or team need no spreadsheets.
  • Modular 2026 pricing lets firms pay only for the apps they use, starting at $17 per user for time tracking and invoicing.
  • Strong reporting for services firms: utilization, revenue forecasting, WIP, quoted vs actuals and budget health reports.
  • Solid security posture for its size: ISO 27001 certification, SSO, two-step verification, SCIM provisioning via Okta and Azure AD, and a choice of AWS hosting regions.
  • Open to automation and AI: REST API, webhooks, Zapier, a new developer portal and an MCP server that connects Scoro data to Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot Studio.

Cons

  • Every combination requires at least five paid users, which inflates cost for very small teams.
  • Reviewers report a steep learning curve and lengthy setup, and some describe parts of the interface as dated.
  • Support quality draws complaints on review sites, with some users saying meaningful help requires paid packages.
  • Add-on, extra, integration and Enterprise prices are hidden behind a configurator or sales, which makes total cost hard to estimate upfront.
  • Competitor reviews say there is no built-in team chat and that Gantt and task features are less flexible than in dedicated project management tools.

Not sold on either?

Related Comparisons