Langdock vs Make (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Make is our pick, scoring 7.4/10 against 7.1/10 for Langdock on our AI Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Cost score (8/10 vs 5/10). Only Make has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
Langdock
7.1/10
Langdock is a Berlin-based, EU-hosted AI workspace where company teams chat with many AI models, build custom agents, and automate workflows under central governance.
Make
7.4/10
Visual no-code automation platform from Celonis that connects thousands of apps and adds AI agents and LLM steps to business workflows.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.1/10 | 7.4/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Output Quality | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | €23.20/user/mo Core | $10.59/mo Core |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | €232/mo Core | Free Free |
| Features | ||
| Private Deployment | ||
| AI Agents | ||
| API Access | ||
| Enterprise Controls | ||
| Text Generation | ||
| Workflow Automation | ||
| Chatbots | Not listed | |
| Knowledge Base Search | Not listed | |
| Transcription | Not listed | |
Langdock vs Make cost by team size
| Team size | Langdock | Make |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | €23/moCore | FreeFree |
| 5 users | €116/moCore | FreeFree |
| 10 users | €232/moCore | FreeFree |
| 25 users | €580/moCore | FreeFree |
| 50 users | €1,160/moCore | FreeFree |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Langdock and Make suit
Langdock fits enterprise better; Make fits startups, operations teams and small business better.
| Audience | Langdock | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Startups | 4/10There is no free tier, only a 7-day trial, and the product targets mid-sized and large organisations. | 8/10A Start-up Plan gives organizations with fewer than 20 employees 50% off the Business plan. |
| Enterprise | 9/10Langdock offers SSO and SCIM, governance, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance, and dedicated or on-premise deployments for large seat counts. | 6/10Enterprise adds custom SSO, audit logs, isolated AWS hosting, and enterprise apps, but AI agents are still in beta. |
| Operations Teams | 5/10The workflow layer chains AI steps into automations, but reviewers say many actions still need humans. | 8/10Branching, loops, and error routes fit complex process automation. |
| Small Business | 5/10Small teams can use it, but reviewers say per-seat pricing feels steep for very small teams. | 8/10There is a permanent free plan, and paid plans start at around $9 a month. |
| Agencies | Not rated | 9/10Reddit users say the visual canvas makes it easier to show clients how their workflows run. |
| Consultancies | 7/10EU hosting, multi-model access and document-based agents suit knowledge work on confidential client material. | Not rated |
| Developers | 6/10An EU-hosted unified API with per-token billing lets developers call the same models. | Not rated |
| Financial Services | 6/10ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and EU hosting suit regulated organisations, though no banks or insurers are named. | Not rated |
| Freelancers | 3/10There is no free tier, and the product is built around team governance rather than solo use. | Not rated |
| Government | 5/10EU hosting and on-premise options for large deployments support public-sector data rules, but no government customers are named. | Not rated |
| IT Teams | 7/10SSO, SCIM, SAML and central governance let IT teams roll out AI to staff in a controlled way. | Not rated |
| Mid-Market | 8/10Per-seat plans with volume discounts and included workflow runs fit companies of a few hundred staff. | Not rated |
| Remote Teams | 4/10Integrations with Slack and Microsoft 365 help, but the notes describe no remote-specific features. | Not rated |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Langdock
- Higher Support score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Analytics score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Includes Private Deployment, which Make lacks
Why choose Make
- Has a free plan (Langdock does not)
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for operations teams (8/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
Langdock
Pros
- Access to 40+ models from several providers in one interface, so teams can switch models without buying separate ChatGPT and Claude licences.
- Strong EU compliance posture: ISO 27001 certification, a SOC 2 Type II audit, GDPR compliance and EU hosting on Azure.
- SSO, SCIM and SAML are included even on the entry Core plan.
- Non-technical staff can build no-code agents with their own knowledge bases and permissions.
- Deployment options range from multi-tenant SaaS to single-tenant, bring-your-own-cloud and on-premise Kubernetes.
Cons
- There is no permanent free tier, only a 7-day trial.
- Dedicated and on-premise deployments require 2,000 to 5,000+ seats.
- Reviewers say its workflows still leave many actions to humans, so automation of operational tasks is limited.
- Building advanced agents has a learning curve.
- Per-seat pricing with Max seat upgrades and workflow add-ons can get expensive for small teams.
Make
Pros
- The visual canvas handles branching, looping, and error routing better than linear tools, according to users.
- Reviewers find it cheaper than Zapier for complex multi-step workflows.
- Routers and error handlers cost no credits.
- The free plan has no time limit, and paid plans start at around $9 a month.
- It holds SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, and ISO 27001, and is GDPR compliant.
- AI tooling includes Maia scenario building, AI Agents with your own LLM key, and an MCP server.
Cons
- Credits are counted per item processed, so loops and polling triggers use up the allowance quickly.
- Scenarios pause when credits run out, and overage protection is Enterprise only.
- AI Agents are still in open beta.
- Mapping, iterators, and aggregators take time to learn.
- Unused credits expire monthly on most plans.
- Trustpilot sentiment is poor, with complaints about bugs and setup.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Make scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.4/10 against 7.1/10 for Langdock. The largest gap is in Cost: 5/10 for Langdock and 8/10 for Make.
Make has a free plan; Langdock does not list one.
Make is the better fit for startups: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 4/10 for Langdock.
Langdock has Private Deployment, which Make lacks.
