GPTBots vs Langdock (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Langdock is our pick, scoring 7.1/10 against 6.6/10 for GPTBots on our AI Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Analytics score (6/10 vs 5/10). Only GPTBots has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
GPTBots
6.6/10
No-code enterprise platform from Aurora Mobile for building AI agents, workflows and chatbots on company knowledge, deployable as SaaS or on-premises.
Langdock
7.1/10
Langdock is a Berlin-based, EU-hosted AI workspace where company teams chat with many AI models, build custom agents, and automate workflows under central governance.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 7.1/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Output Quality | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | €23.20/user/mo Core |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | €232/mo Core |
| Features | ||
| AI Agents | ||
| API Access | ||
| Chatbots | ||
| Enterprise Controls | ||
| Knowledge Base Search | ||
| Private Deployment | ||
| Text Generation | ||
| Workflow Automation | ||
| Data Analysis | Not listed | |
| Transcription | Not listed | |
GPTBots vs Langdock cost by team size
| Team size | GPTBots | Langdock |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | €23/moCore |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | €116/moCore |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | €232/moCore |
| 25 users | FreeFree | €580/moCore |
| 50 users | FreeFree | €1,160/moCore |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who GPTBots and Langdock suit
| Audience | GPTBots | Langdock |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | 8/10SSO, RBAC, audit logs, ISO and SOC 2 certifications, and on-premises deployment target large organisations. | 9/10Langdock offers SSO and SCIM, governance, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance, and dedicated or on-premise deployments for large seat counts. |
| Mid-Market | 7/10The Business plan's 10 seats and 100 agents fit mid-size teams, though they must get a sales quote. | 8/10Per-seat plans with volume discounts and included workflow runs fit companies of a few hundred staff. |
| Small Business | 4/10The free plan is very limited and paid plans need a sales conversation with no published price. | 5/10Small teams can use it, but reviewers say per-seat pricing feels steep for very small teams. |
| Consultancies | Not rated | 7/10EU hosting, multi-model access and document-based agents suit knowledge work on confidential client material. |
| Customer Support Teams | 8/10Support agent templates, a wide range of messaging channels and handoff to help desks like Intercom and Zoho SalesIQ are central to the product. | Not rated |
| Developers | Not rated | 6/10An EU-hosted unified API with per-token billing lets developers call the same models. |
| E-commerce | 7/10Vendor case studies cover e-commerce service and price tracking, and WhatsApp, Instagram and Messenger channels are supported. | Not rated |
| Financial Services | Not rated | 6/10ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and EU hosting suit regulated organisations, though no banks or insurers are named. |
| Freelancers | Not rated | 3/10There is no free tier, and the product is built around team governance rather than solo use. |
| Government | Not rated | 5/10EU hosting and on-premise options for large deployments support public-sector data rules, but no government customers are named. |
| IT Teams | Not rated | 7/10SSO, SCIM, SAML and central governance let IT teams roll out AI to staff in a controlled way. |
| Operations Teams | Not rated | 5/10The workflow layer chains AI steps into automations, but reviewers say many actions still need humans. |
| Remote Teams | Not rated | 4/10Integrations with Slack and Microsoft 365 help, but the notes describe no remote-specific features. |
| Sales Teams | 6/10An AI SDR template and automated lead response over WhatsApp and LINE are offered. | Not rated |
| Startups | Not rated | 4/10There is no free tier, only a 7-day trial, and the product targets mid-sized and large organisations. |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose GPTBots
- Has a free plan (Langdock does not)
Why choose Langdock
- Higher Analytics score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Cost score (5/10 vs 4/10)
Pros & Cons
GPTBots
Pros
- Four build modes in one product (Agent, FlowAgent, MultiAgent and Workflow) let teams start simple and add canvas logic or multi-agent teams later.
- You can pick from many model providers, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek and Mistral, without supplying your own API keys.
- Plain-language queries against MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, MongoDB and other databases, with chart output, go beyond document-only RAG.
- Strong governance: SAML 2.0 and OIDC SSO, RBAC plus ABAC, permanent audit logs of model calls and tool use, and listed SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001/27701 certifications.
- Three hosting models (SaaS, dedicated cloud, on-premises) suit companies with data residency requirements.
- G2 reviewers rate it about 4.8 of 5 and frequently praise how responsive vendor support is.
Cons
- No public price for the Business or Enterprise plans, so you have to talk to sales to budget.
- Credit usage varies by model and token count, which makes costs hard to predict, and top-up credits expire after a year.
- G2 reviewers repeatedly cite incomplete developer documentation and a small plugin library.
- There is no built-in human agent inbox, so live handoff needs a third-party help desk or a webhook.
- There are no official language SDKs, only a REST API, and the free tier's rate limits are restrictive.
Langdock
Pros
- Access to 40+ models from several providers in one interface, so teams can switch models without buying separate ChatGPT and Claude licences.
- Strong EU compliance posture: ISO 27001 certification, a SOC 2 Type II audit, GDPR compliance and EU hosting on Azure.
- SSO, SCIM and SAML are included even on the entry Core plan.
- Non-technical staff can build no-code agents with their own knowledge bases and permissions.
- Deployment options range from multi-tenant SaaS to single-tenant, bring-your-own-cloud and on-premise Kubernetes.
Cons
- There is no permanent free tier, only a 7-day trial.
- Dedicated and on-premise deployments require 2,000 to 5,000+ seats.
- Reviewers say its workflows still leave many actions to humans, so automation of operational tasks is limited.
- Building advanced agents has a learning curve.
- Per-seat pricing with Max seat upgrades and workflow add-ons can get expensive for small teams.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Langdock scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.1/10 against 6.6/10 for GPTBots. The largest gap is in Analytics: 5/10 for GPTBots and 6/10 for Langdock.
GPTBots has a free plan; Langdock does not list one.
