Fluix vs Scoop Solar (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Scoop Solar is our pick, scoring 6.9/10 against 6.6/10 for Fluix on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Customization score (9/10 vs 5/10). For 10 users, Fluix costs about $290/mo, against $1,158/mo for Scoop Solar; neither Fluix nor Scoop Solar lists a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
Fluix
6.6/10
Mobile inspection and form workflow software that helps asset-heavy field teams digitize checklists, approvals, and reports, with offline capture.
Scoop Solar
6.9/10
Configurable project, field service and O&M operations software for solar installers, EPCs, battery storage and EV charging infrastructure teams.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 6.9/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $29/user/mo Crews | $1,158/mo Residential and Service |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $290/mo Crews | $1,158/mo Residential and Service |
| Features | ||
| Inspection Checklists | ||
| Offline Field App | ||
| Asset Registry | Not listed | |
| Safety and Compliance | Not listed | |
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
Fluix vs Scoop Solar cost by team size
Fluix costs less up to 25 users; Scoop Solar costs less at 50 users.
| Team size | Fluix | Scoop Solar |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $145/moCrews | $1,158/moResidential and Service |
| 5 users | $145/moCrews | $1,158/moResidential and Service |
| 10 users | $290/moCrews | $1,158/moResidential and Service |
| 25 users | $725/moCrews | $1,158/moResidential and Service |
| 50 users | $1,450/moCrews | $1,158/moResidential and Service |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Fluix and Scoop Solar suit
| Audience | Fluix | Scoop Solar |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Companies | 8/10Wind and oil and gas customers such as Siemens Gamesa and CPP Australia are named, and the industry is a stated focus. | 9/10It is built specifically for solar, battery storage and EV charging companies. |
| Field Teams | 9/10The product is built for crews filling out inspection forms on mobile devices, including offline. | 8/10Its mobile app pushes work orders to technicians and captures checklists and photos offline. |
| Maintenance Teams | 6/10It handles inspections and corrective issues well but lacks full CMMS planning. | 7/10It handles O&M service visits and work orders for solar assets. |
| Small Business | 5/10The 5-seat minimum and per-user pricing are manageable, but there is no free tier. | 4/10With plans starting above 1,000 USD a month and a long setup, it is heavy for very small installers. |
| Construction | 7/10Construction is one of the vendor's listed target industries. | 7/10Installers and EPCs use it to track installation projects from start to finish. |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Fluix
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: $290/mo vs $1,158/mo
- Higher Security score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Scoop Solar
- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Fluix
Pros
- The iOS and Android apps work fully offline and sync later, which suits remote wind, oil and gas, and aviation sites.
- Teams can turn existing PDF forms into digital checklists with logic, photos, and signatures instead of rebuilding them.
- There are native connectors to Salesforce, SAP, Power BI, SharePoint, and Microsoft 365, plus Zapier.
- The pricing page lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA compliance.
- Fluix is rated 4.8 on both G2 and Capterra, and G2 reviewers rate it easier to set up and administer than GoCanvas.
Cons
- Annual pricing is not published, there are seat minimums of 5, 15, and 25 users, and there is no free plan.
- Some reviewers say limited customization makes advanced or complex forms hard to build.
- Users report occasional glitches, such as awkward date entry on mobile.
- It is not a full CMMS: there is no preventive maintenance planning, parts inventory, or sensor monitoring.
- G2 reviewers preferred GoCanvas for its product roadmap and feature updates.
Scoop Solar
Pros
- Reviewers on SoftwareFinder rate customer support 9 out of 10 and describe staff as responsive and knowledgeable.
- Admins can build workflows, conditional forms and reports themselves without leaning on the vendor.
- Users are unlimited on every plan, so subcontractors and field crews add no per-seat cost.
- Through GLOO, Scoop builds and maintains integrations with tools such as Salesforce, HubSpot, Aurora Solar and QuickBooks.
- The mobile app collects checklists, photos and data offline at job sites.
Cons
- Entry prices start above 1,000 USD a month, and integrations and analytics cost extra.
- Reviewers say initial configuration can take months and there is no quick out-of-the-box setup.
- Beginners find the rules and conditions engine complex, and reviewers say training videos are limited.
- Users report occasional mobile sync problems, and calendar entries must be linked to a project.
- It is not a CRM, design or accounting tool, so you still need separate software for those.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Scoop Solar scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.9/10 against 6.6/10 for Fluix. The largest gap is in Customization: 5/10 for Fluix and 9/10 for Scoop Solar.
Fluix costs less for 10 users: about $290/mo on its Crews plan, against about $1,158/mo on its Residential and Service plan for Scoop Solar, billed monthly.
No, neither Fluix nor Scoop Solar lists a free plan.
