Fluix vs Limble (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Fluix and Limble both score 6.6/10 on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. Neither Fluix nor Limble lists a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
Fluix
6.6/10
Mobile inspection and form workflow software that helps asset-heavy field teams digitize checklists, approvals, and reports, with offline capture.
Limble
6.6/10
Limble is a cloud and mobile maintenance management system (CMMS) that maintenance teams use to track assets, work orders, preventive maintenance and spare parts.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $29/user/mo Crews | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $290/mo Crews | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Asset Registry | ||
| Inspection Checklists | ||
| Offline Field App | ||
| Condition Monitoring | Not listed | |
| Preventive Maintenance | Not listed | |
| SCADA and IoT Integration | Not listed | |
| Spare Parts Inventory | Not listed | |
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
Fluix vs Limble cost by team size
| Team size | Fluix | Limble |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $145/moCrews | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | $145/moCrews | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | $290/moCrews | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | $725/moCrews | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | $1,450/moCrews | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Fluix and Limble suit
Limble fits maintenance teams and small business better than Fluix.
| Audience | Fluix | Limble |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance Teams | 6/10It handles inspections and corrective issues well but lacks full CMMS planning. | 10/10Limble is a CMMS built around maintenance work orders, preventive maintenance and assets. |
| Small Business | 5/10The 5-seat minimum and per-user pricing are manageable, but there is no free tier. | 7/10The Standard tier covers core CMMS needs, but it caps work orders that use procedures. |
| Construction | 7/10Construction is one of the vendor's listed target industries. | Not rated |
| Energy Companies | 8/10Wind and oil and gas customers such as Siemens Gamesa and CPP Australia are named, and the industry is a stated focus. | Not rated |
| Enterprise | Not rated | 6/10Enterprise adds multi-location tools and SSO, but critics say per-seat costs rise steeply above about 200 users. |
| Field Teams | 9/10The product is built for crews filling out inspection forms on mobile devices, including offline. | Not rated |
| Manufacturing | Not rated | 8/10It offers integrations with machine-health tools such as Augury and Guidewheel, plus 21 CFR compliance on Enterprise. |
| Mid-Market | Not rated | 8/10Reviewers describe its asset hierarchy and fast rollout as a good fit for mid-market complexity. |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Fluix
- Higher Security score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Higher Analytics score (6/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Limble
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Higher Customization score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for maintenance teams (10/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for small business (7/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
Fluix
Pros
- The iOS and Android apps work fully offline and sync later, which suits remote wind, oil and gas, and aviation sites.
- Teams can turn existing PDF forms into digital checklists with logic, photos, and signatures instead of rebuilding them.
- There are native connectors to Salesforce, SAP, Power BI, SharePoint, and Microsoft 365, plus Zapier.
- The pricing page lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA compliance.
- Fluix is rated 4.8 on both G2 and Capterra, and G2 reviewers rate it easier to set up and administer than GoCanvas.
Cons
- Annual pricing is not published, there are seat minimums of 5, 15, and 25 users, and there is no free plan.
- Some reviewers say limited customization makes advanced or complex forms hard to build.
- Users report occasional glitches, such as awkward date entry on mobile.
- It is not a full CMMS: there is no preventive maintenance planning, parts inventory, or sensor monitoring.
- G2 reviewers preferred GoCanvas for its product roadmap and feature updates.
Limble
Pros
- Every plan includes unlimited assets, work orders and preventive maintenance, unlimited cloud storage, and a 99.99% uptime SLA.
- It integrates with several condition-monitoring vendors, including Augury, AssetWatch, Monnit and VibeCloud, and Augury alerts become work orders automatically.
- It has ready-made ERP connectors for SAP S/4HANA, NetSuite, Dynamics 365 Business Central and QuickBooks Online.
- It holds a 4.8 rating on Capterra (753 reviews) and on Gartner Peer Insights, and reviewers often praise its support.
- A competitor's review describes implementation as typically taking two to four weeks.
Cons
- No public prices are listed. Buyers must use the online calculator or talk to sales.
- On Standard, work orders with attached procedures and advanced analytics are each capped at 3 per month.
- Offline mode, spare-parts inventory, meter-based scheduling and API access require Premium+ or higher.
- Reviewers mention limited reporting flexibility and templates that can't be edited.
- Many integrations, SSO and 21 CFR compliance may cost extra.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Fluix and Limble both score 6.6/10 on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. The largest gap is in Analytics: 6/10 for Fluix and 5/10 for Limble.
No, neither Fluix nor Limble lists a free plan.
Limble is the better fit for maintenance teams: we rate it 10/10 for them, against 6/10 for Fluix.
