b stack radar

Fluix vs HSI Donesafe (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

HSI Donesafe is our pick, scoring 6.8/10 against 6.6/10 for Fluix on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Customization score (8/10 vs 5/10). Neither Fluix nor HSI Donesafe lists a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

Fluix logo

Fluix

6.6/10

Mobile inspection and form workflow software that helps asset-heavy field teams digitize checklists, approvals, and reports, with offline capture.

HSI Donesafe logo

HSI Donesafe

6.8/10

Winner

A cloud EHSQ platform for mid-market and enterprise organizations. It covers incidents, risk, audits, inspections, chemicals, assets, and quality across more than 60 no-code modules.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Fluix logo
Fluix
HSI Donesafe logo
HSI Donesafe
Scores
Overall Rating6.6/106.8/10
Integration7/106/10
Security8/107/10
Support7/107/10
Cost5/104/10
Analytics6/107/10
Ease of Use8/107/10
Customization5/108/10
Scalability7/107/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid plan$29/user/mo
Crews
Contact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 users$290/mo
Crews
Contact for pricing
Features
Asset Registry
Inspection Checklists
Offline Field App
Preventive MaintenanceNot listed
Safety and ComplianceNot listed

Fluix vs HSI Donesafe cost by team size

Team sizeFluixHSI Donesafe
1 user$145/moCrewsContact for pricing
5 users$145/moCrewsContact for pricing
10 users$290/moCrewsContact for pricing
25 users$725/moCrewsContact for pricing
50 users$1,450/moCrewsContact for pricing

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Who Fluix and HSI Donesafe suit

Fluix fits field teams better than HSI Donesafe.

AudienceFluixHSI Donesafe
Field Teams9/10The product is built for crews filling out inspection forms on mobile devices, including offline.7/10The offline mobile app lets field workers complete audits and report hazards without a connection.
Construction7/10Construction is one of the vendor's listed target industries.7/10Software Advice lists it in its construction category, and its incident, risk, and inspection modules fit construction safety programs.
Energy Companies8/10Wind and oil and gas customers such as Siemens Gamesa and CPP Australia are named, and the industry is a stated focus.Not rated
EnterpriseNot rated7/10The vendor lists large customers such as Toyota and Nokia, offers regional hosting, and holds ISO 27001 certification.
Maintenance Teams6/10It handles inspections and corrective issues well but lacks full CMMS planning.Not rated
ManufacturingNot rated7/10Its chemical, SDS, quality, and supplier modules address common manufacturing compliance needs.
Mid-MarketNot rated8/10G2 data shows most reviewers come from mid-market companies, and the per-module pricing suits teams of that size.
Operations TeamsNot rated8/10Its core purpose is to run EHSQ operational processes such as incidents, audits, and corrective actions.
Small Business5/10The 5-seat minimum and per-user pricing are manageable, but there is no free tier.Not rated

Which One Should You Choose?

Fluix logo
Why choose Fluix

  • Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Security score (8/10 vs 7/10)
  • Better fit for field teams (9/10 vs 7/10)

HSI Donesafe logo
Why choose HSI Donesafe

  • Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 6/10)

Pros & Cons

Fluix logo
Fluix

Pros

  • The iOS and Android apps work fully offline and sync later, which suits remote wind, oil and gas, and aviation sites.
  • Teams can turn existing PDF forms into digital checklists with logic, photos, and signatures instead of rebuilding them.
  • There are native connectors to Salesforce, SAP, Power BI, SharePoint, and Microsoft 365, plus Zapier.
  • The pricing page lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA compliance.
  • Fluix is rated 4.8 on both G2 and Capterra, and G2 reviewers rate it easier to set up and administer than GoCanvas.

Cons

  • Annual pricing is not published, there are seat minimums of 5, 15, and 25 users, and there is no free plan.
  • Some reviewers say limited customization makes advanced or complex forms hard to build.
  • Users report occasional glitches, such as awkward date entry on mobile.
  • It is not a full CMMS: there is no preventive maintenance planning, parts inventory, or sensor monitoring.
  • G2 reviewers preferred GoCanvas for its product roadmap and feature updates.

HSI Donesafe logo
HSI Donesafe

Pros

  • The no-code builder lets administrators change forms, workflows, and notifications without help from developers.
  • A broad set of more than 60 modules puts incidents, chemicals, injury claims, quality, and ESG in one shared system.
  • The offline mobile app on Apple, Android, and Windows lets field staff complete audits and log incidents without coverage.
  • Hosting is available in the EU, US, Australia, and Asia, and the platform holds ISO 27001 certification, which helps with data residency requirements.
  • Review scores are strong, around 4.8 on Software Advice and 4.5 on G2.

Cons

  • No public pricing. Buyers must go through a demo and quote, and one listing suggests about 10,000 USD per year as a starting point.
  • Asset features are limited to registers, QR lookups, and reminders. There is no condition monitoring, predictive maintenance, or SCADA connectivity.
  • Integration relies on a general API and single sign-on, with no published library of named connectors, so setup effort may be needed.
  • Its broad configurability can mean a longer initial setup before teams see the full benefit.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

HSI Donesafe scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.6/10 for Fluix. The largest gap is in Customization: 5/10 for Fluix and 8/10 for HSI Donesafe.

No, neither Fluix nor HSI Donesafe lists a free plan.

Fluix is the better fit for field teams: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for HSI Donesafe.

Related Comparisons