Favro vs Plutio Comparison
Compare Favro vs Plutio features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Favro
6.6/10
Favro is a Swedish work-planning tool that combines boards, sheets, roadmaps and docs in one workspace, aimed at agile teams in game studios and tech companies.
Plutio
6.6/10
All-in-one workspace for freelancers and small service businesses that combines projects, tasks, time tracking, proposals, contracts, invoicing, scheduling and branded client portals.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $5/user/mo Lite | $19/mo Core |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | $49/mo Pro |
| Features | ||
| Gantt charts | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Client collaboration | ||
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Dashboards | ||
| Docs | ||
| File sharing | ||
| Kanban boards | ||
| Knowledge base | ||
| Reporting | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| Spreadsheet interface | ||
| Task lists | ||
| Task management | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Workflow automation | ||
| Databases | Not listed | |
| Team messaging | Not listed | |
| Timeline view | Not listed | |
Favro vs Plutio cost by team size
| Team size | Favro | Plutio |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | $19/moCore |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | $49/moPro |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | $49/moPro |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | $49/moPro |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | $49/moPro |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Favro
- Higher Scalability score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (6/10 vs 3/10)
- Better fit for mid-market (7/10 vs 4/10)
Why choose Plutio
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for agencies (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Includes Gantt charts, which Favro lacks
Pros & Cons
Favro
Pros
- The same card can sit on several team boards at once, so cross-team planning does not require duplicate tasks.
- Annual per-user prices of 5.10 USD on Lite and 6.80 USD on Standard are low for the category.
- Jira, Miro and Unito sync in both directions, and GitHub and GitLab can move cards when code is merged.
- The vendor states ISO/IEC 27001 and 27701 certification, and Enterprise adds SAML SSO and SCIM.
- Supports Kanban, Scrumban and SAFe, which is why it is popular with game and software studios.
- Every paid plan has a 14-day trial with no credit card required.
Cons
- There is no native Gantt chart or resource allocation, according to reviews.
- Reviewers report slower performance when many participants join a single project.
- Some reviewers say new users face a steep learning curve.
- Seats are sold in fixed buckets, so a team of 3 pays for 5 users.
- Timesheets, full dashboards, SSO and SCIM are only available on Enterprise, which has no public price.
- Monthly per-user prices are not shown publicly, and switching billing frequency means cancelling and resubscribing.
Plutio
Pros
- Flat workspace pricing instead of per-seat fees. Pro covers 30 contributors for $49 a month, and Max allows unlimited contributors for $199.
- Every plan includes the full set of core modules, including client portal, contracts, time tracking and scheduling. Plans differ mainly in client, contributor, AI and storage limits.
- Billable time from timers and timesheets can be turned straight into invoices, with payments through Stripe (including ACH), PayPal or Square and no Plutio transaction fees.
- Highly customizable workspace, with custom fields, multiple task views including timeline with dependencies, and dashboards that double as branded client portals.
- Well-documented REST API with OAuth 2 authentication and an MCP server for AI assistants, plus integrations included free on all plans.
Cons
- Native automation draws repeated complaints on Capterra and G2. Some reviewers say they still need Zapier or Make, and one called the automation marketing overstated.
- Some reviews on AppSumo, Capterra and G2 describe support tickets going unanswered for weeks and bugs left unfixed.
- Reporting is limited to dashboard widgets and timesheet breakdowns. Reviewers note weak utilization, margin and capacity analytics.
- Few native integrations beyond payments, calendars and video calls. Tools like Slack, CRMs and accounting apps mostly rely on Zapier, Make or webhooks.
- The Core plan's 9-client cap and lack of contributors force growing solo businesses up to the $49 Pro plan.
- The public changelog has no entries after September 2025, which makes recent development hard to track.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Favro and Plutio both score 6.6/10 on our Project Management criteria. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 6/10 for Favro and 7/10 for Plutio.
No, neither Favro nor Plutio lists a free plan.
Plutio is the better fit for agencies: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 5/10 for Favro.
Plutio has Gantt charts, which Favro lacks.
