b stack radar

FARO Sphere XG vs Trendspek: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of FARO Sphere XG and Trendspek to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

F

FARO Sphere XG

5.9/10

FARO Sphere XG is a cloud platform where construction, operations and geospatial teams process, view, measure and share point clouds, 360 photos and BIM models.

Trendspek logo

Trendspek

6.8/10

Winner

Trendspek is a 3D structural lifecycle management platform that lets infrastructure owners and engineers inspect, report on, plan remediation for, and monitor assets in engineering-grade digital twins.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
F
FARO Sphere XG
Trendspek logo
Trendspek
Scores
Overall Rating5.9/106.8/10
Integration5/107/10
Security8/109/10
Support7/107/10
Cost4/105/10
Analytics5/107/10
Ease of Use7/106/10
Customization5/107/10
Scalability7/107/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingContact for pricing
Features
Digital Twin
LiDAR Processing
Asset RegistryNot listed
Document ControlNot listed
Drone InspectionNot listed
Inspection AutomationNot listed
Inspection ChecklistsNot listed

Which One Should You Choose?

F
Why choose FARO Sphere XG

  • Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 6/10)

Trendspek logo
Why choose Trendspek

  • Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 5/10)

Pros & Cons

F
FARO Sphere XG

Pros

  • It accepts data from FARO terrestrial and mobile scanners, from iPhone LiDAR and from 360 cameras, so mixed capture methods end up in one cloud project.
  • The Stream app pre-registers Orbis scans in the field, which reduces failed registrations and repeat site visits.
  • Scans are placed on floor plans and sorted by date, which suits progress documentation and dispute records.
  • A SOC 2 Type 2 examination by A-LIGN covers FARO Sphere and HoloBuilder.
  • Capterra reviewers give it a high average rating and mention responsive customer support.

Cons

  • There is no public pricing. Every package needs a custom quote from FARO.
  • It works best with FARO hardware, and third-party integrations are not well documented.
  • Some reviewers say the editing layout is hard to navigate, and others say pricing could be better.
  • It has no maintenance, work-order or asset-registry functions for industrial operations.

Trendspek logo
Trendspek

Pros

  • Unlimited users on every plan, so contractors and stakeholders can be added without per-seat fees
  • Overlays and compares photogrammetry, lidar, thermal and BIM data on one 3D asset record
  • Strong security credentials, with ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and SOC 2 Type II, plus SSO, MFA and private cloud options
  • Large named customers report results, such as NSW Ports cutting the cost of a jetty inspection by two-thirds
  • The asset owner keeps the inspection history, whichever contractor did the capture

Cons

  • No public prices, so a quote requires a consultation and pilot
  • Processing of new captures is billed separately from the plan
  • Not a full CMMS: work orders and spare parts depend on external integrations
  • Few independent user reviews are available on the major review sites

Not sold on either?

Air Inspection Automation (AiA) logo

Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product

Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.

Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools

Frequently Asked Questions

Trendspek scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 5.9/10 for FARO Sphere XG. The largest gap is in Analytics: 5/10 for FARO Sphere XG and 7/10 for Trendspek.

No, neither FARO Sphere XG nor Trendspek lists a free plan.

Related Comparisons