Everhour vs TimeLog: Complete Comparison (2026)

Why choose Everhour

• Has a free plan (TimeLog does not)
• Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 5/10)
• Better fit for agencies (9/10 vs 7/10)
• Better fit for freelancers (5/10 vs 3/10)

Why choose TimeLog

• Higher Customization score (6/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Security score (6/10 vs 5/10)
• Better fit for mid-market (8/10 vs 6/10)
• Better fit for accountants and bookkeepers (7/10 vs 5/10)

Everhour

Pros

• More than 20 native integrations, including Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Jira and Linear, put a timer directly on tasks, and reviewers praise these integrations most.
• A browser extension adds tracking to more than 20 other web apps, such as Figma, HubSpot and Zendesk.
• Budgets with alerts, expense tracking and invoicing that syncs to QuickBooks, Xero or FreshBooks cover billable work end to end.
• The Team plan costs 8.50 USD per seat per month on yearly billing, and the free plan covers up to 5 seats.
• Reviewers often single out the customer support, and Everhour holds about a 4.8 out of 5 average across 139 SpotSaaS ratings.

Cons

• It is not a standalone PM suite: it has no Gantt charts, docs or whiteboards.
• The free plan has no integrations, which are the product's main value.
• Paid plans require 5 seats and payment by card only, and unused time is not refunded when you cancel.
• Its security documentation relies on AWS's SOC 2 compliance rather than its own report, and it does not run formal periodic risk assessments.
• Some users report hours that failed to record, too many reminder alerts, and limited chart-style reporting.

TimeLog

Pros

• It combines time registration, project budgets and invoicing in one system, which reviewers value for billing clients accurately.
• Support is often described as responsive, with chat, email, phone and a help center available.
• The free, no-code e-conomic integration and the Business Central and Navision connectors suit Nordic and Microsoft-based finance teams.
• Pricing is transparent per user, and a 14-day trial is available on the self-serve tiers.
• Project and contract setups are flexible, including retainers, fixed price and rate indexing.

Cons

• Reviewers call the standard reports inflexible or outdated and want more custom report options.
• The many settings make navigation and user-rights administration hard for new admins.
• Integrations and API access are not available on the Starter plan.
• One developer review describes the API as lacking essential features.
• Notifications and approval reminders are described as limited.