Dashpivot vs FARO Sphere XG (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Dashpivot is our pick, scoring 7/10 against 5.9/10 for FARO Sphere XG on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Customization score (9/10 vs 5/10). Only Dashpivot has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026

Dashpivot
7/10
Dashpivot by Sitemate is a no-code forms and workflow platform that lets construction and infrastructure teams run safety, quality, and field reporting digitally.
FARO Sphere XG
5.9/10
FARO Sphere XG is a cloud platform where construction, operations and geospatial teams process, view, measure and share point clouds, 360 photos and BIM models.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | F FARO Sphere XG |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7/10 | 5.9/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $25.20/user/mo Standard | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Digital Twin | Not listed | |
| Inspection Checklists | Not listed | |
| LiDAR Processing | Not listed | |
| Offline Field App | Not listed | |
| Safety and Compliance | Not listed | |
Dashpivot vs FARO Sphere XG cost by team size
| Team size | Dashpivot | FARO Sphere XG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Dashpivot and FARO Sphere XG suit
| Audience | Dashpivot | FARO Sphere XG |
|---|---|---|
| Construction | 9/10Built for construction field reporting, and around half of Capterra reviewers work in construction. | 9/10Its floor plan progress tracking, 360 jobsite capture and record-keeping for disputes are aimed at construction projects. |
| Engineering Firms | 7/10Sitemate sells it to infrastructure and civil teams for quality and test records. | 7/10Teams can align georeferenced models with point clouds to check for deviations and clashes. |
| Enterprise | Not rated | 7/10The Enterprise package adds multi-project dashboards, single sign-on and tiered user management. |
| Field Teams | 8/10The offline mobile app captures forms and GPS-tagged photos on site. | Not rated |
| Operations Teams | Not rated | 6/10FARO markets it to operations and facility teams for remote site visibility. |
| Small Business | 6/10There is a free plan and many reviewers are small companies, but per-user minimums apply. | Not rated |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Dashpivot

- Has a free plan (FARO Sphere XG does not)
- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Integration score (6/10 vs 5/10)
FWhy choose FARO Sphere XG
- Higher Security score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Dashpivot

Pros
- Reviewers repeatedly praise how far forms can be customised, including calculations, logic, and automation.
- The mobile app captures forms and GPS-tagged photos offline and uploads them automatically when the device reconnects.
- A free plan lets teams try the product before buying.
- Flowsite connects Dashpivot to accounting and BI tools such as Xero, QuickBooks, and Power BI without code.
- Sitemate lists SOC 2 Type II, SSO, role-based access, and full audit trails.
Cons
- Per-user minimum licence counts depend on company size, so small teams may pay for unused seats.
- A reviewer reported they could not go back and amend forms after approval.
- Some reviewers say the app is slow to load in certain situations.
- It has no CMMS-style asset registry, spare parts tracking, or sensor integration.
- There is no free trial of paid tiers, and exact prices are set by an account manager.
FFARO Sphere XG
Pros
- It accepts data from FARO terrestrial and mobile scanners, from iPhone LiDAR and from 360 cameras, so mixed capture methods end up in one cloud project.
- The Stream app pre-registers Orbis scans in the field, which reduces failed registrations and repeat site visits.
- Scans are placed on floor plans and sorted by date, which suits progress documentation and dispute records.
- A SOC 2 Type 2 examination by A-LIGN covers FARO Sphere and HoloBuilder.
- Capterra reviewers give it a high average rating and mention responsive customer support.
Cons
- There is no public pricing. Every package needs a custom quote from FARO.
- It works best with FARO hardware, and third-party integrations are not well documented.
- Some reviewers say the editing layout is hard to navigate, and others say pricing could be better.
- It has no maintenance, work-order or asset-registry functions for industrial operations.
Not sold on either?

Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Dashpivot scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 7/10 against 5.9/10 for FARO Sphere XG. The largest gap is in Customization: 9/10 for Dashpivot and 5/10 for FARO Sphere XG.
Dashpivot has a free plan; FARO Sphere XG does not list one.





