Claude for Work vs Sana: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Claude for Work and Sana to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Claude for Work
7.2/10
Anthropic's business plans (Team and Enterprise) for Claude, giving organizations shared AI chat, coding, agents and connectors with central admin and billing.
Sana
6.5/10
Sana is an enterprise AI platform from Workday. It provides no-code AI agents, search across company knowledge, and meeting assistance for large organisations.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.2/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 3/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Integration | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Output Quality | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $20/user/mo Enterprise | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $250/mo Team Standard seat | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| AI Agents | ||
| Enterprise Controls | ||
| Knowledge Base Search | ||
| Text Generation | ||
| Workflow Automation | ||
| API Access | Not listed | |
| Chatbots | Not listed | |
| Code Generation | Not listed | |
| Data Analysis | Not listed | |
| Private Deployment | Not listed | |
| Transcription | Not listed | |
Claude for Work vs Sana cost by team size
| Team size | Claude for Work | Sana |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $50/moTeam Standard seat | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | $125/moTeam Standard seat | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | $250/moTeam Standard seat | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | $625/moTeam Standard seat | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | $1,250/moTeam Standard seat | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Claude for Work
- Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Output Quality score (9/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for startups (9/10 vs 1/10)
- Better fit for small business (8/10 vs 2/10)
Why choose Sana
- Higher Support score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Analytics score (6/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
Claude for Work
Pros
- Claude Code and Cowork agents are included in every Team seat, so a single subscription covers chat, coding and agentic work.
- Standard and Premium seats can be mixed, so only heavy users need the $100 to $125 Premium tier.
- Since 2026 the seat minimum is two, down from five, and monthly billing makes small-team trials cheap.
- Enterprise offers strong governance, including SCIM, audit logs, a Compliance API, IP allowlisting and a HIPAA-ready option.
- Up to $500 a month of pooled API credits on Team lets teams prototype on the developer platform.
Cons
- Per-seat session and weekly usage caps frustrate heavy users, and Claude Code draws on the same pool.
- Users have reported limits draining unexpectedly, and a class action alleges usage limits were misleading.
- On Team, audit logs, SCIM and the Compliance API require Enterprise, which has a 20-seat minimum.
- Enterprise adds API-rate usage on top of seat fees, which makes the total cost hard to predict.
- Plan terms changed several times in 2026, so buyers need to recheck current limits at checkout.
Sana
Pros
- Sana claims more than one million users, including Merck and Polestar, and the product is now backed by Workday.
- Integrated sources keep their original permissions, which reduces the risk of oversharing in knowledge search.
- Includes SAML SSO, SCIM, AES-256 encryption at rest and a single-tenant deployment option.
- Handles many content types, including meeting recordings, Office files, spreadsheets and video.
- Non-technical staff can build agents with the no-code builder and extend integrations through an MCP client.
Cons
- There is no public pricing. Only a custom Enterprise quote is available.
- The Free and Team plans were removed in 2026, so there is no way for small teams to start.
- Independent reviews are scarce: Gartner Peer Insights showed only one rating.
- Vendor pages contradict each other on SOC 2 status, listing both Type 1 and Type 2.
- The roadmap now depends on Workday's agent strategy, which may matter less to companies that do not use Workday.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Claude for Work scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.2/10 against 6.5/10 for Sana. The largest gap is in Cost: 6/10 for Claude for Work and 3/10 for Sana.
No, neither Claude for Work nor Sana lists a free plan.
Claude for Work is the better fit for startups: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 1/10 for Sana.
