Langdock vs Sana Comparison

Compare Langdock vs Sana features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

Langdock

7.1/10

Winner

Langdock is a Berlin-based, EU-hosted AI workspace where company teams chat with many AI models, build custom agents, and automate workflows under central governance.

Full review Pricing Visit site

Sana

6.5/10

Sana is an enterprise AI platform from Workday. It provides no-code AI agents, search across company knowledge, and meeting assistance for large organisations.

Full review Pricing Visit site

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature	Langdock	Sana
Scores
Overall Rating	7.1/10	6.5/10
Analytics	6/10	6/10
Cost	5/10	3/10
Customization	8/10	7/10
Ease of Use	7/10	7/10
Integration	7/10	7/10
Output Quality	8/10	7/10
Scalability	8/10	8/10
Security	9/10	8/10
Support	7/10	7/10
Pricing
Free plan	No	No
Cheapest paid plan	€23/user/mo Core	Contact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 users	€232/mo Core	Contact for pricing
Features
AI Agents
Chatbots
Enterprise Controls
Knowledge Base Search
Private Deployment
Text Generation
Transcription
Workflow Automation
API Access		Not listed

Langdock vs Sana cost by team size

Team size	Langdock	Sana
1 user	€23/moCore	Contact for pricing
5 users	€116/moCore	Contact for pricing
10 users	€232/moCore	Contact for pricing
25 users	€580/moCore	Contact for pricing
50 users	€1,160/moCore	Contact for pricing

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Why choose Langdock

Higher Cost score (5/10 vs 3/10)
Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 2/10)
Better fit for startups (4/10 vs 1/10)

Why choose Sana

Our data shows no clear advantage over Langdock.

Pros & Cons

Langdock

Pros

Access to 40+ models from several providers in one interface, so teams can switch models without buying separate ChatGPT and Claude licences.
Strong EU compliance posture: ISO 27001 certification, a SOC 2 Type II audit, GDPR compliance and EU hosting on Azure.
SSO, SCIM and SAML are included even on the entry Core plan.
Non-technical staff can build no-code agents with their own knowledge bases and permissions.
Deployment options range from multi-tenant SaaS to single-tenant, bring-your-own-cloud and on-premise Kubernetes.

Cons

There is no permanent free tier, only a 7-day trial.
Dedicated and on-premise deployments require 2,000 to 5,000+ seats.
Reviewers say its workflows still leave many actions to humans, so automation of operational tasks is limited.
Building advanced agents has a learning curve.
Per-seat pricing with Max seat upgrades and workflow add-ons can get expensive for small teams.

Sana

Pros

Sana claims more than one million users, including Merck and Polestar, and the product is now backed by Workday.
Integrated sources keep their original permissions, which reduces the risk of oversharing in knowledge search.
Includes SAML SSO, SCIM, AES-256 encryption at rest and a single-tenant deployment option.
Handles many content types, including meeting recordings, Office files, spreadsheets and video.
Non-technical staff can build agents with the no-code builder and extend integrations through an MCP client.

Cons

There is no public pricing. Only a custom Enterprise quote is available.
The Free and Team plans were removed in 2026, so there is no way for small teams to start.
Independent reviews are scarce: Gartner Peer Insights showed only one rating.
Vendor pages contradict each other on SOC 2 status, listing both Type 1 and Type 2.
The roadmap now depends on Workday's agent strategy, which may matter less to companies that do not use Workday.