Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Apollo Comparison
Compare Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Apollo features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
7.6/10
Amazon's public cloud platform, with over 200 pay-as-you-go services for compute, storage, databases, networking and AI, used by startups through large enterprises and governments.
Apollo
6.5/10
Apollo is a sales intelligence and engagement platform that combines a B2B contact database, email sequencing, a dialer and deal tracking for outbound sales teams.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.6/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Analytics | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 10/10 | 6/10 |
| Ease of Use | 4/10 | 8/10 |
| Integration | 10/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $49/user/mo Basic |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free plan | Free Free |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Multiple Regions | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| Built-in Calling | Not listed | |
| Collaboration | Not listed | |
| Lead Management | Not listed | |
| Integrations | Not listed | |
| Sales Automation | Not listed | |
| Opportunity Management | Not listed | |
| Contact Management | Not listed | |
| Reporting & Analytics | Not listed | |
Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Apollo cost by team size
Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Apollo cost the same at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree plan | FreeFree |
| 5 users | FreeFree plan | FreeFree |
| 10 users | FreeFree plan | FreeFree |
| 25 users | FreeFree plan | FreeFree |
| 50 users | FreeFree plan | FreeFree |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Amazon Web Services (AWS)
- Higher Customization score (10/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Scalability score (10/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (10/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for saas companies (9/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Apollo
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for small business (8/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Pros
- The service catalogue is unusually broad, with over 200 services across 38 regions, so most infrastructure needs can be met on one platform.
- EC2 has a 99.99% region-level SLA with credits of up to 100%, and instances unavailable for more than six minutes in an hour are not billed for that hour.
- The free plan gives up to $200 in credits, and more than 30 always-free services let new teams experiment at low cost.
- Support scales from a $29 minimum up to dedicated Enterprise and Unified Operations tiers for mission-critical workloads.
- G2 rates it 4.4 across more than 17,000 reviews, and reviewers praise its scalability and global reach.
Cons
- Reviewers widely cite a steep learning curve across the console and services.
- Usage pricing is complex and can produce unexpected bills unless spend is monitored closely.
- Paid support is billed as a percentage of total AWS spend, so support costs rise with usage.
- A July 2025 billing console bug showed customers estimated charges in the billions, which hurt trust in its cost tooling.
Apollo
Pros
- Prospect database, email sequencing, dialer and enrichment come in one subscription, so teams buy fewer tools.
- The free plan has no time limit and lets a team try the full prospecting workflow.
- Reviewers rate ease of use highly, and G2 shows about 4.7 out of 5 from roughly 9,700 reviews.
- Admins can pool credits across the team and set per-user caps.
Cons
- Many reviews report inaccurate data, especially mobile numbers and contacts outside North America.
- Credits expire each cycle, phone reveals cost about eight times as much as an email, and credits are spent even on bad records.
- Support is the lowest-rated G2 subcategory, and Trustpilot shows a TrustScore of about 3.1.
- API access and SSO require the top Custom plan, and every seat must be on the same plan.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon Web Services (AWS) scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.6/10 against 6.5/10 for Apollo. The largest gap is in Customization: 10/10 for Amazon Web Services (AWS) and 6/10 for Apollo.
Both are free for 10 users.
Yes, both Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Apollo have a free plan.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 10/10 for them, against 5/10 for Apollo.
