b stack radar

Amazon CloudFront vs Liquid Web Comparison

Compare Amazon CloudFront vs Liquid Web features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

A

Amazon CloudFront

7.9/10

Winner

Amazon CloudFront is the AWS content delivery network. It caches and serves websites, APIs and media from more than 750 edge locations, and includes DDoS protection, WAF and edge compute.

Liquid Web logo

Liquid Web

6.2/10

Liquid Web is a US managed hosting provider. It sells VPS, cloud VPS, dedicated servers and managed WordPress hosting to businesses that need hands-on server management.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
A
Amazon CloudFront
Liquid Web logo
Liquid Web
Scores
Overall Rating7.9/106.2/10
Integration9/105/10
Support6/108/10
Cost6/104/10
Customization9/107/10
Security9/107/10
Reliability9/108/10
Ease of Use5/105/10
Analytics7/104/10
Scalability10/106/10
Pricing
Free planYesNo
Cheapest paid plan$15/mo
Pro (flat-rate)
$11/mo
Cloud VPS Compute 2 GB
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Free (flat-rate)
$11/mo
Cloud VPS Compute 2 GB
Features
Dedicated Servers
Managed WordPress
API and CLI
DDoS Protection
Free SSL Certificates
Multiple Regions
Uptime SLA
Automatic BackupsNot listed
Cloud ComputeNot listed
Content Delivery NetworkNot listed
Serverless FunctionsNot listed
Shared HostingNot listed
VPS HostingNot listed

Amazon CloudFront vs Liquid Web cost by team size

Amazon CloudFront costs less at every team size we checked.

Team sizeAmazon CloudFrontLiquid Web
1 userFreeFree (flat-rate)$11/moCloud VPS Compute 2 GB
5 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)$11/moCloud VPS Compute 2 GB
10 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)$11/moCloud VPS Compute 2 GB
25 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)$11/moCloud VPS Compute 2 GB
50 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)$11/moCloud VPS Compute 2 GB

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

A
Why choose Amazon CloudFront

  • Has a free plan (Liquid Web does not)
  • Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $11/mo
  • Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Scalability score (10/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 6/10)

Liquid Web logo
Why choose Liquid Web

  • Higher Support score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for small business (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Includes Dedicated Servers, which Amazon CloudFront lacks
  • Includes Managed WordPress, which Amazon CloudFront lacks

Pros & Cons

A
Amazon CloudFront

Pros

  • The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
  • Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
  • Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
  • It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
  • Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.

Cons

  • G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
  • Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
  • Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
  • Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
  • Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.

Liquid Web logo
Liquid Web

Pros

  • Fully managed VPS and dedicated plans cover monitoring, updates and ServerSecure hardening.
  • The SLA promises 99.99 percent uptime, and the dedicated page adds a 30-minute hardware replacement guarantee.
  • Cloud VPS comes in compute, memory and CPU-optimized sizes, with hourly billing.
  • Managed dedicated plans include 500 GB of Acronis backups and DDoS protection.
  • Data centers are in the US, Europe and Australia and are assessed for HIPAA and PCI-DSS.

Cons

  • Reviewers repeatedly call it more expensive than budget hosts such as Hostinger and InterServer.
  • There is no built-in CDN, and it offers no managed Kubernetes or serverless products.
  • The InterWorx and SiteWorx control panels can confuse beginners.
  • Some recent user reviews say support has slowed since the ownership change.
  • Windows servers and cPanel or Plesk licences cost extra.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Amazon CloudFront scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 6.2/10 for Liquid Web. The largest gap is in Integration: 9/10 for Amazon CloudFront and 5/10 for Liquid Web.

Amazon CloudFront costs less for 10 users: free on its Free (flat-rate) plan, against about $11/mo on its Cloud VPS Compute 2 GB plan for Liquid Web, billed monthly.

Amazon CloudFront has a free plan; Liquid Web does not list one.

Amazon CloudFront is the better fit for developers: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 6/10 for Liquid Web.

Liquid Web has Dedicated Servers and Managed WordPress, which Amazon CloudFront lacks.

Related Comparisons