b stack radar

Amazon CloudFront vs Lambda Comparison

Compare Amazon CloudFront vs Lambda features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

A

Amazon CloudFront

7.9/10

Winner

Amazon CloudFront is the AWS content delivery network. It caches and serves websites, APIs and media from more than 750 edge locations, and includes DDoS protection, WAF and edge compute.

Lambda logo

Lambda

6.1/10

Lambda is a GPU cloud that rents NVIDIA GPU virtual machines and multi-node clusters, billed by the hour, to AI teams that train and serve models.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
A
Amazon CloudFront
Lambda logo
Lambda
Scores
Overall Rating7.9/106.1/10
Integration9/105/10
Support6/105/10
Cost6/106/10
Customization9/106/10
Security9/107/10
Reliability9/106/10
Ease of Use5/106/10
Analytics7/104/10
Scalability10/108/10
Pricing
Free planYesNo
Cheapest paid plan$15/mo
Pro (flat-rate)
Contact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Free (flat-rate)
Contact for pricing
Features
Dedicated Servers
API and CLI
Multiple Regions
Cloud ComputeNot listed
Content Delivery NetworkNot listed
DDoS ProtectionNot listed
Free SSL CertificatesNot listed
Managed WordPress
Serverless FunctionsNot listed
Shared Hosting
Uptime SLANot listed

Amazon CloudFront vs Lambda cost by team size

Team sizeAmazon CloudFrontLambda
1 userFreeFree (flat-rate)Contact for pricing
5 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)Contact for pricing
10 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)Contact for pricing
25 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)Contact for pricing
50 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)Contact for pricing

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

A
Why choose Amazon CloudFront

  • Has a free plan (Lambda does not)
  • Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 3/10)

Lambda logo
Why choose Lambda

  • Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)
  • Includes Dedicated Servers, which Amazon CloudFront lacks

Pros & Cons

A
Amazon CloudFront

Pros

  • The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
  • Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
  • Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
  • It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
  • Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.

Cons

  • G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
  • Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
  • Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
  • Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
  • Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.

Lambda logo
Lambda

Pros

  • A wide GPU range, from $0.69 per hour V100-class cards to B200, suits both small experiments and large training runs.
  • A December 2025 comparison reports no egress or data transfer fees, which helps when moving large datasets in and out.
  • Lambda Stack images come with PyTorch, CUDA and drivers preinstalled, so ML engineers can start training soon after launch.
  • SemiAnalysis testing found full expected interconnect bandwidth and strong health checks on Slurm clusters.
  • Lambda's trust page lists SOC 2 Type II, and a trust portal provides the report and pentest results on request.

Cons

  • Popular GPUs often sell out on demand, according to several reviews.
  • The new list prices from November 2026 are well above the H100 rates of around $2.99 reported in 2025.
  • Kubernetes and Slurm need Lambda engineers to set up, and SemiAnalysis rated the console and onboarding as immature.
  • There is no CDN, managed databases, serverless functions or general web hosting, and object storage was still in development.
  • Lambda has no official Terraform provider or CLI documented, only community Terraform providers.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Amazon CloudFront scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 6.1/10 for Lambda. The largest gap is in Integration: 9/10 for Amazon CloudFront and 5/10 for Lambda.

Amazon CloudFront has a free plan; Lambda does not list one.

Amazon CloudFront is the better fit for small business: we rate it 5/10 for them, against 3/10 for Lambda.

Lambda has Dedicated Servers, which Amazon CloudFront lacks.

Related Comparisons