Trendspek vs Zertify (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Trendspek is our pick, scoring 6.8/10 against 5.6/10 for Zertify on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (7/10 vs 3/10). Neither Trendspek nor Zertify lists a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026

Trendspek
6.8/10
Trendspek is a 3D structural lifecycle management platform that lets infrastructure owners and engineers inspect, report on, plan remediation for, and monitor assets in engineering-grade digital twins.

Zertify
5.6/10
Zertify is Spinnsol's cloud inspection and certification software for testing, inspection and certification firms, with modules for lifting equipment, NDT and offshore cargo carrying units.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.8/10 | 5.6/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Asset Registry | ||
| Inspection Checklists | ||
| Digital Twin | Not listed | |
| Document Control | Not listed | |
| Drone Inspection | Not listed | |
| Inspection Automation | Not listed | |
| LiDAR Processing | Not listed | |
| Offline Field App | Not listed | |
| Safety and Compliance | Not listed | |
Who Trendspek and Zertify suit
Trendspek fits energy companies better than Zertify.
| Audience | Trendspek | Zertify |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Companies | 9/10Customers include Chevron, Woodside, Suncor and Grain LNG, and their energy facilities are a core use case. | 7/10Spinnsol targets oil and gas asset integrity and offshore container certification, and G2 reviewers include oil and gas users. |
| Drone Service Providers | 6/10Capture providers have a partner pathway and deliver drone data into owners' records. | Not rated |
| Engineering Firms | 8/10Engineers measure and mark up defects on 3D models, and the vendor runs a partner pathway for engineering firms. | Not rated |
| Enterprise | 8/10It offers SSO, private cloud, ISO and SOC 2 certifications, and portfolio dashboards for large asset owners. | Not rated |
| Field Teams | Not rated | 7/10Inspectors enter results on site from mobile devices, and the platform offers an online and offline mode. |
| Maintenance Teams | Not rated | 5/10It tracks inspection due dates and asset condition history, but it does not provide maintenance work orders or parts management. |
| Manufacturing | Not rated | 5/10Its NDT and lifting equipment inspection modules apply to plants that run regulated lifting gear or weld testing. |
| Small Business | Not rated | 6/10Specialist inspection and certification service companies are a core market, and reviewers say setup is quick. |
| Utilities | 7/10It is used on critical infrastructure such as telecom networks and ports. | Not rated |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Trendspek

- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Security score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for energy companies (9/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Zertify

- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Trendspek

Pros
- Unlimited users on every plan, so contractors and stakeholders can be added without per-seat fees
- Overlays and compares photogrammetry, lidar, thermal and BIM data on one 3D asset record
- Strong security credentials, with ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and SOC 2 Type II, plus SSO, MFA and private cloud options
- Large named customers report results, such as NSW Ports cutting the cost of a jetty inspection by two-thirds
- The asset owner keeps the inspection history, whichever contractor did the capture
Cons
- No public prices, so a quote requires a consultation and pilot
- Processing of new captures is billed separately from the plan
- Not a full CMMS: work orders and spare parts depend on external integrations
- Few independent user reviews are available on the major review sites
Zertify

Pros
- It is built specifically for TIC workflows, with LOLER and LEEA support for lifting gear, DNV 2.7-1 and EN 12079 for offshore containers, and six common NDT methods.
- Inspection due dates are set automatically, and customers get advance notice of expiring certificates and training records.
- Client-facing digital certificates come with QR-code verification and a portal where asset owners can book inspections and download certificates.
- G2 reviewers rate it about 4.7 to 4.8 out of 5 and mention quick setup, an intuitive interface and responsive support.
- Checklists and workflows can be configured to fit each customer's inspection regime.
Cons
- No pricing is published, so every buyer has to go through sales for a quote.
- There is no public API documentation or integrations directory, and one G2 reviewer noted the lack of Microsoft Copilot integration.
- Security details beyond SSL, multi-factor authentication and single sign-on are not documented, and no compliance certifications are listed.
- Reviewers say predictive analytics and AI-driven risk forecasting are limited, and one reported alignment issues on equipment certificates.
- It is a small vendor with a limited independent review base, and the company blog has not been updated since 2022.
Not sold on either?

Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Trendspek scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 5.6/10 for Zertify. The largest gap is in Integration: 7/10 for Trendspek and 3/10 for Zertify.
No, neither Trendspek nor Zertify lists a free plan.
Trendspek is the better fit for energy companies: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for Zertify.





