b stack radar

Scopevisio vs Supporting Strategies (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

Scopevisio is our pick, scoring 6.4/10 against 5.8/10 for Supporting Strategies on our Finance Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Security score (9/10 vs 5/10). Neither Scopevisio nor Supporting Strategies lists a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

Scopevisio logo

Scopevisio

6.4/10

Winner

Cloud ERP from Bonn for German-speaking mid-sized companies, combining GoBD-compliant accounting, invoice processing, DMS, CRM, HR and project billing in modules.

Supporting Strategies logo

Supporting Strategies

5.8/10

US franchise network that provides outsourced bookkeeping, accounts payable and receivable, payroll administration and controller services to small and mid-sized businesses.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Scopevisio logo
Scopevisio
Supporting Strategies logo
Supporting Strategies
Scores
Overall Rating6.4/105.8/10
Scalability7/105/10
Analytics6/106/10
Compliance9/106/10
Integration6/106/10
Security9/105/10
Support6/107/10
Cost3/104/10
Customization6/107/10
Ease of Use5/107/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingContact for pricing
Features
Accounts Payable
Bank Reconciliation
Expense Management
Financial Reporting
General Ledger
Invoicing
Payroll
Tax Compliance
Accountant AccessNot listed
Audit TrailNot listed
Budgeting and ForecastingNot listed
Multi-entity ConsolidationNot listed

Who Scopevisio and Supporting Strategies suit

Scopevisio fits enterprise and mid-market better; Supporting Strategies fits small business and nonprofits better.

AudienceScopevisioSupporting Strategies
Enterprise6/10The Enterprise tier and group functions support dozens of companies and hundreds of users, but consolidation relies on a Lucanet link.2/10It is a franchise bookkeeping service for SMBs and is not built for enterprise finance operations.
Small Business4/10Its smallest example package costs about 600 euros a month, and rollout needs consulting, so it is heavy for very small firms.8/10The company aims its outsourced bookkeeping and back-office services mainly at small businesses and has its own small-business industry page.
Mid-Market9/10The vendor positions the product for the German-speaking Mittelstand, and its pricing examples run from 10 to 500 named users.6/10Controller services and a dedicated team suit growing mid-sized firms, but how deep the controller work goes depends on the local office.
Nonprofits5/10Associations are listed as a target group by erp-software.org, but there is no dedicated nonprofit feature set.7/10It offers nonprofit services, including grant management and fund accounting.
Healthcare7/10It has a dedicated healthcare solution with a hospital information system connection and C5-tested hosting, with example packages for care homes and hospital groups.7/10It has an industry-specific offering for healthcare practices.
Accountants and Bookkeepers6/10It offers DATEV export, DATEVconnect online and read-only advisor roles, but it is not built mainly as a practice tool.Not rated
Consultancies8/10Its service-provider solution covers time tracking, project costing and automated billing of services.Not rated
LegalNot rated7/10It has an industry-specific offering for law firms.

Which One Should You Choose?

Scopevisio logo
Why choose Scopevisio

  • Higher Security score (9/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Compliance score (9/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for enterprise (6/10 vs 2/10)
  • Better fit for mid-market (9/10 vs 6/10)

Supporting Strategies logo
Why choose Supporting Strategies

  • Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Support score (7/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for small business (8/10 vs 4/10)
  • Better fit for nonprofits (7/10 vs 5/10)

Pros & Cons

Scopevisio logo
Scopevisio

Pros

  • Strong German compliance coverage, including GoBD audits by PwC, XRechnung and ZUGFeRD intake, ELSTER, and DATEV export and DATEVconnect online for tax advisors.
  • Security credentials above most cloud finance tools, with ISO 27001 certification, a BSI C5 Type 2 attestation and German-only data hosting.
  • Finance, DMS, CRM, HR and payroll, and project billing share one database, so reviewers can drill from reports down to the source document.
  • Group functions with intercompany reconciliation suit organisations that run several legal entities in one instance.

Cons

  • Costs add up. One OMR reviewer reported a bill that grew from 23 EUR to about 209 EUR a month as modules were added.
  • Pricing is not transparent. Only example packages and a per-user-per-day range are published, and monthly billing costs extra.
  • Rollout is training- and consulting-heavy. GetApp cites 15 to 30 days for a 250-person firm, and the vendor quotes 4 to 12 weeks.
  • Some users find the web interface and accounting side dated, and say fully automated dunning is missing.
  • Multi-currency handling and full consolidation are not documented in detail. Consolidation relies on the Lucanet partner link.

Supporting Strategies logo
Supporting Strategies

Pros

  • One dedicated US-based team can take over bookkeeping, bill pay, invoicing, collections and payroll administration, so a small business can avoid hiring in-house finance staff.
  • Every month the client gets a balance sheet, an income statement and a cash flow statement, and can add KPI dashboards, job costing or inventory reports.
  • Controller services include cash flow forecasting, budgets and budget-versus-actual analysis, which is more than basic bookkeeping firms usually offer.
  • The team works in common platforms such as QuickBooks Online, NetSuite, BILL, Gusto and Expensify, and it is a BILL Platinum Partner.
  • With 20+ years in business and about 100 franchise offices, clients can have local, in-person relationships.
  • The two verified Clutch reviews give 5.0 scores for quality, cost and responsiveness, and both reviewers have been clients for several years.

Cons

  • No prices are published, so every engagement needs a local quote.
  • Because each franchise office runs independently, team quality and controller depth can vary by location.
  • Independent reviews are very scarce: Clutch has only two, and the major software review sites have almost none.
  • It is not a CPA firm and does not prepare income tax returns, so clients still need a separate CPA.
  • No security certifications such as SOC 2 are named on its public pages.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Scopevisio scores higher on our Finance Software criteria: 6.4/10 against 5.8/10 for Supporting Strategies. The largest gap is in Security: 9/10 for Scopevisio and 5/10 for Supporting Strategies.

No, neither Scopevisio nor Supporting Strategies lists a free plan.

Scopevisio is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 6/10 for them, against 2/10 for Supporting Strategies.

Related Comparisons