Rukovoditel vs Scoro: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Rukovoditel and Scoro to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Rukovoditel
6.1/10
Free, open-source, self-hosted PHP/MySQL app builder that small teams configure into a CRM, project tracker, helpdesk or ERP without coding.
Scoro
6.3/10
Modular professional services automation platform for agencies and consultancies that links CRM, quoting, projects, resource planning, time tracking and invoicing.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.1/10 | 6.3/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Integration | 4/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 3/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Cost | 10/10 | 4/10 |
| Scalability | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $17/user/mo Time-billing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free (open source core) | $170/mo Time-billing |
| Features | ||
| Built-in Calling | Not listed | |
| Collaboration | Not listed | |
| Contact Management | Not listed | |
| Customer Support Management | Not listed | |
| Integrations | Not listed | |
| Lead Management | Not listed | |
| Marketing Automation | Not listed | |
| Mobile Access | Not listed | |
| Opportunity Management | Not listed | |
| Reporting & Analytics | Not listed | |
| Sales Automation | Not listed | |
| More features | ||
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Time tracking | Not listed | |
| Reporting | Not listed | |
| Dashboards | Not listed | |
| App integrations | Not listed | |
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| Gantt charts | Not listed | |
| Goals and OKRs | Not listed | |
| Kanban boards | Not listed | |
| Scheduling | Not listed | |
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Timeline view | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | Not listed | |
Rukovoditel vs Scoro cost by team size
Rukovoditel costs less from 5 users.
| Team size | Rukovoditel | Scoro |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree (open source core) | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | FreeFree (open source core) | $85/moTime-billing |
| 10 users | FreeFree (open source core) | $170/moTime-billing |
| 25 users | FreeFree (open source core) | $425/moTime-billing |
| 50 users | FreeFree (open source core) | $850/moTime-billing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Rukovoditel
- Has a free plan (Scoro does not)
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $170/mo
- Higher Cost score (10/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for freelancers (6/10 vs 2/10)
Why choose Scoro
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Security score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for mid-market (8/10 vs 3/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (6/10 vs 3/10)
Pros & Cons
Rukovoditel
Pros
- The core is free and open source, with no per-user fees.
- The Extension is a one-time 245 USD purchase that includes future updates, rather than a subscription.
- The visual designer lets you build custom entities, fields and relationships without programming.
- It is lightweight; one user reported it running quickly on under 1 GB of RAM.
Cons
- It needs considerable initial configuration and does not work as a CRM out of the box.
- The API, telephony, email marketing and Kanban require the paid Extension.
- It is self-hosted only, with no published compliance certifications or formal support plans.
- Independent review coverage is thin.
Scoro
Pros
- Covers the full service-delivery cycle (CRM, quotes, projects, time, resourcing, bills and invoices) in one data model, so margin reports by client, project or team need no spreadsheets.
- Modular 2026 pricing lets firms pay only for the apps they use, starting at $17 per user for time tracking and invoicing.
- Strong reporting for services firms: utilization, revenue forecasting, WIP, quoted vs actuals and budget health reports.
- Solid security posture for its size: ISO 27001 certification, SSO, two-step verification, SCIM provisioning via Okta and Azure AD, and a choice of AWS hosting regions.
- Open to automation and AI: REST API, webhooks, Zapier, a new developer portal and an MCP server that connects Scoro data to Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot Studio.
Cons
- Every combination requires at least five paid users, which inflates cost for very small teams.
- Reviewers report a steep learning curve and lengthy setup, and some describe parts of the interface as dated.
- Support quality draws complaints on review sites, with some users saying meaningful help requires paid packages.
- Add-on, extra, integration and Enterprise prices are hidden behind a configurator or sales, which makes total cost hard to estimate upfront.
- Competitor reviews say there is no built-in team chat and that Gantt and task features are less flexible than in dedicated project management tools.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Scoro scores higher on our CRM criteria: 6.3/10 against 6.1/10 for Rukovoditel. The largest gap is in Cost: 10/10 for Rukovoditel and 4/10 for Scoro.
Rukovoditel costs less for 10 users: free on its Free (open source core) plan, against about $170/mo on its Time-billing plan for Scoro, billed monthly.
Rukovoditel has a free plan; Scoro does not list one.
Scoro is the better fit for mid-market: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 3/10 for Rukovoditel.
