b stack radar

RTK-DC vs Vercel: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of RTK-DC and Vercel to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

RTK-DC logo

RTK-DC

5.9/10

RTK-DC is Rostelecom's data center and cloud subsidiary. It offers colocation, public cloud IaaS, Kubernetes, managed databases and GPU capacity to Russian businesses.

Vercel logo

Vercel

6.9/10

Winner

Frontend cloud platform from the makers of Next.js that builds and deploys web apps from Git to a global CDN with serverless functions.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
RTK-DC logo
RTK-DC
Vercel logo
Vercel
Scores
Overall Rating5.9/106.9/10
Integration5/108/10
Support6/105/10
Cost4/104/10
Customization6/106/10
Security7/108/10
Reliability7/108/10
Ease of Use5/109/10
Analytics5/107/10
Scalability7/108/10
Pricing
Free planNoYes
Cheapest paid planContact for pricing$20/user/mo
Pro
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricing$200/mo
Pro
Features
DDoS Protection
Multiple Regions
API and CLINot listed
Automatic BackupsNot listed
Cloud ComputeNot listed
Content Delivery NetworkNot listed
Dedicated ServersNot listed
Free SSL CertificatesNot listed
Git DeploymentsNot listed
Managed DatabasesNot listed
Managed KubernetesNot listed
Managed WordPressNot listed
Object StorageNot listed
Serverless FunctionsNot listed
Shared HostingNot listed
VPS HostingNot listed

RTK-DC vs Vercel cost by team size

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

RTK-DC logo
Why choose RTK-DC

  • Higher Support score (6/10 vs 5/10)

Vercel logo
Why choose Vercel

  • Has a free plan (RTK-DC does not)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (9/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 3/10)

Pros & Cons

RTK-DC logo
RTK-DC

Pros

  • One of Russia's largest commercial data center networks, with about 25 Tier III sites cited in 2025
  • Covers colocation through managed Kubernetes and six managed database engines from a single provider
  • Offers GPU capacity on NVIDIA H200 for AI workloads
  • A single cloud.rt.ru portal manages both colocation requests and cloud resources

Cons

  • No public pricing, so every service needs a quote
  • Focused on Russia, with little English-language documentation
  • The company websites blocked automated access during research, which limited verification
  • Little independent user review coverage on G2 or Capterra

Vercel logo
Vercel

Pros

  • Every pull request automatically gets its own preview URL, which reviewers rate as the most polished preview workflow available.
  • New Next.js features work on Vercel from launch day, because Vercel maintains the framework.
  • Automatic DDoS mitigation and a basic firewall are included on every plan, including the free one.
  • The compliance list is strong: ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, PCI DSS, TISAX Level 2, and HIPAA on Enterprise.
  • Pro includes unlimited viewer seats, so non-developers can review work without paying for a seat.

Cons

  • There is no hard spending cap, only alerts, so traffic spikes or bot crawls can produce large overage bills.
  • Each developer costs $20 per month on Pro, which makes larger teams expensive.
  • Next.js features such as ISR, image optimization and middleware create lock-in that makes migrating away costly.
  • It is not a full backend: databases come from marketplace partners rather than Vercel itself.
  • The jump from Pro to Enterprise is steep, and user reports complain of slow support on billing issues.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Vercel scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 6.9/10 against 5.9/10 for RTK-DC. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 5/10 for RTK-DC and 9/10 for Vercel.

Vercel has a free plan; RTK-DC does not list one.

Vercel is the better fit for startups: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 3/10 for RTK-DC.

Related Comparisons