Raptor Maps vs Sitemark: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Raptor Maps and Sitemark to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Raptor Maps
5.8/10
Raptor Maps is solar asset management software that turns drone, robotic and sensor inspection data into a map-based digital twin for solar owners, O&M providers and EPCs.
Sitemark
5.9/10
Sitemark is a cloud platform for solar, battery storage and grid sites that combines drone and AI inspections, construction tracking and O&M work management.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 5.8/10 | 5.9/10 |
| Analytics | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| GIS and Mapping | ||
| Offline Field App | Not listed | |
| Digital Twin | ||
| Drone Inspection | ||
| SCADA and IoT Integration | Not listed | |
| Inspection Automation | ||
| Inspection Checklists | ||
| Asset Registry | ||
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Raptor Maps
- Higher Integration score (6/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Sitemark
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Raptor Maps
Pros
- Built only for solar, so defect detection and reporting are tailored to PV modules and balance-of-system equipment.
- Solar Sentry autonomous drones can launch missions from SCADA alerts or after storms without anyone travelling to the site.
- The mobile app works offline, which helps technicians at remote solar sites with poor signal.
- An OAuth-based API exposes farms, inspections and anomalies for use in other systems.
- Well funded, with a $35M Series C in late 2024 from Maverix and existing investors.
Cons
- No public pricing; every purchase goes through a demo and sales.
- Limited to solar PV and unsuitable for other asset types.
- Almost no independent user reviews on G2 or SourceForge.
- No published security certifications such as SOC 2 were found.
Sitemark
Pros
- One platform covers the solar lifecycle, from construction progress and commissioning through thermography inspections and O&M work orders.
- Users on G2 and Capterra mainly praise the easy interface and quick support responses, with ratings around 4.8 on G2 and 5.0 on Capterra.
- Flexible data capture: teams can fly their own drones or order flights through Sitemark's partner network.
- Large installed base, with a claimed 1,300+ companies and 15,000+ sites across 100+ countries.
Cons
- No public pricing, so every buyer has to go through a quote or demo.
- The product is narrowly focused on solar and renewables and is not a general CMMS for other asset types.
- Integration and API details are not public, and SourceForge lists no API.
- Review volume is small: about 28 reviews on G2 and 5 on Capterra.
Not sold on either?
Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Sitemark scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 5.9/10 against 5.8/10 for Raptor Maps. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 6/10 for Raptor Maps and 8/10 for Sitemark.
No, neither Raptor Maps nor Sitemark lists a free plan.
