Mattermost vs Teable: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Mattermost and Teable to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Mattermost
6.7/10
Self-hostable, open-source team messaging and workflow platform with playbooks, kanban boards and AI agents, built for security-conscious and regulated organizations.
Teable
6.8/10
Teable is an open-source, AI-assisted no-code database on PostgreSQL that gives teams a spreadsheet interface, app builder and automations, as cloud or self-hosted.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.7/10 | 6.8/10 |
| Analytics | 3/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 10/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | $10/user/mo Professional | $13/user/mo Pro |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Team Edition | Free Free |
| Features | ||
| Team messaging | Not listed | |
| File sharing | ||
| Client collaboration | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | ||
| Kanban boards | ||
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Scheduling | Not listed | |
| Databases | Not listed | |
| Spreadsheet interface | Not listed | |
| Timeline view | Not listed | |
| Dashboards | Not listed | |
Mattermost vs Teable cost by team size
Mattermost and Teable cost the same at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Mattermost | Teable |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeTeam Edition | FreeFree |
| 5 users | FreeTeam Edition | FreeFree |
| 10 users | FreeTeam Edition | FreeFree |
| 25 users | FreeTeam Edition | FreeFree |
| 50 users | FreeTeam Edition | FreeFree |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Mattermost
- Higher Security score (10/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for developers (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Teable
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Analytics score (5/10 vs 3/10)
- Better fit for small business (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
Mattermost
Pros
- Can be fully self-hosted or air-gapped, which suits defense, government and regulated industries
- Enterprise tiers include strong compliance tooling: FIPS 140-3 builds, legal hold, compliance export and granular RBAC
- Playbooks give incident and DevOps teams repeatable checklists with automated triggers inside chat
- Built-in Jira, GitHub and GitLab integrations, plus an open API for custom bots
- Open-source core under MIT and AGPL licenses avoids full vendor lock-in
Cons
- The Boards kanban plugin is in maintenance mode and has been removed from the in-product marketplace
- Since v11 the free Entry plan shows only the last 10,000 messages and Team Edition is capped at 250 users, which drew community criticism
- The vendor publishes no prices, licenses are annual prepaid only, and every server needs its own license
- No Gantt charts, time tracking or project reporting, so it cannot replace a dedicated project management tool
- Self-hosting requires admin time and server upkeep
Teable
Pros
- Data lives in real PostgreSQL tables, so teams can query it with SQL and connect external BI or ETL tools.
- The free AGPL Community Edition can be self-hosted with Docker for full control over data.
- Annual paid seats ($13 for Pro, $20 for Business) cost less than comparable Airtable tiers.
- SSO is included in the Business plan without an enterprise contract.
- AI chat, AI fields and the App Builder let non-developers build schemas and internal apps from a description.
Cons
- Few native integrations, so most connections rely on the REST API and webhooks.
- AI credits can be used up quickly during heavy App Builder use.
- An independent review reports that audit logs are not yet available.
- No Gantt chart, time tracking or other dedicated project-management features.
- Few reviews on major sites such as G2, so independent evidence is thin.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Teable scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.7/10 for Mattermost. The largest gap is in Security: 10/10 for Mattermost and 6/10 for Teable.
Both are free for 10 users.
Yes, both Mattermost and Teable have a free plan.
Mattermost is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 5/10 for Teable.
