b stack radar

Linear vs Moxo: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of Linear and Moxo to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

Linear logo

Linear

6.8/10

Winner

Linear is an issue tracking and project planning tool built for software product and engineering teams, with cycles, roadmaps, triage and AI agents.

Moxo logo

Moxo

6.2/10

Moxo is a client-facing workflow and portal platform that runs approvals, onboarding and service processes across internal teams, clients and partners, with AI agents.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Linear logo
Linear
Moxo logo
Moxo
Scores
Overall Rating6.8/106.2/10
Integration7/107/10
Analytics6/107/10
Customization5/107/10
Ease of Use9/106/10
Support6/106/10
Cost6/102/10
Scalability8/108/10
Security8/109/10
Pricing
Free planYesNo
Cheapest paid plan$10/user/mo
Basic
Contact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Free
Contact for pricing
Features
App integrations
Task listsNot listed
Timeline viewNot listed
Task management
Time trackingNot listed
Workflow automation
Dashboards
Kanban boardsNot listed
Collaboration toolsNot listed
Reporting
Goals and OKRsNot listed
Team messagingNot listed
File sharingNot listed
Client collaborationNot listed
Knowledge baseNot listed

Linear vs Moxo cost by team size

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Linear logo
Why choose Linear

  • Has a free plan (Moxo does not)
  • Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 2/10)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (9/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for startups (9/10 vs 2/10)
  • Better fit for freelancers (4/10 vs 2/10)

Moxo logo
Why choose Moxo

  • Higher Customization score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for operations teams (7/10 vs 2/10)

Pros & Cons

Linear logo
Linear

Pros

  • Reviewers repeatedly name the interface as one of the fastest in the category, with interactions that feel instant.
  • The Free plan includes unlimited members, the API and webhooks, and Linear Agent.
  • Built-in AI features include triage routing, MCP access and coding agent sessions.
  • The security page lists SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, and a HIPAA BAA is available on request.

Cons

  • The workflow is built for software teams and fits non-engineering use poorly.
  • There is no native time tracking, and G2 reviewers say epic management is weak.
  • Dashboards, SAML and SCIM require the custom-priced Enterprise plan.
  • Some AI features use separate AI credits, so the per-seat price can understate the total cost.

Moxo logo
Moxo

Pros

  • Combines messaging, file sharing, e-signatures, approvals and workflows in one branded client portal, which Capterra reviewers describe as polished.
  • External participants sign in by magic link with no account or download.
  • Strong compliance and deployment options: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, SAML SSO and cloud, private cloud or on-premises hosting.
  • Built-in SLA dashboards, cycle-time reporting and a granular audit log suit regulated processes.
  • G2 reviewers rate it 4.5 out of 5 and often praise its ease of use and support.

Cons

  • The entry tier costs $5,000 a year, is billed annually only, and Moxo's own pricing page shows no prices.
  • Workflow automation, API access and AI agents moved to the custom-quoted Scale plan in 2026.
  • Lacks classic project management views such as Gantt charts, Kanban boards and time tracking.
  • Some users find flow creation complicated and describe a learning curve.
  • Some Capterra reviews report billing disputes and poor customer service.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Linear scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.2/10 for Moxo. The largest gap is in Cost: 6/10 for Linear and 2/10 for Moxo.

Linear has a free plan; Moxo does not list one.

Linear is the better fit for startups: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 2/10 for Moxo.

Related Comparisons