Latitude.sh vs RTK-DC: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Latitude.sh and RTK-DC to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Latitude.sh
6.9/10
Bare metal cloud provider that offers dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual machines on demand, billed hourly or monthly, for developers and infrastructure-heavy businesses.
RTK-DC
5.9/10
RTK-DC is Rostelecom's data center and cloud subsidiary. It offers colocation, public cloud IaaS, Kubernetes, managed databases and GPU capacity to Russian businesses.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.9/10 | 5.9/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| DDoS Protection | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| API and CLI | Not listed | |
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
Latitude.sh vs RTK-DC cost by team size
| Team size | Latitude.sh | RTK-DC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Latitude.sh
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for startups (7/10 vs 3/10)
Why choose RTK-DC
Our data shows no clear advantage over Latitude.sh.
Pros & Cons
Latitude.sh
Pros
- Prices for every metal, GPU and VM plan are listed publicly, with hourly rates as well as monthly ones.
- Each listed plan includes 20 TB of outbound bandwidth, and inbound traffic is unlimited.
- Servers are offered in 26 locations, including several in Latin America such as Sao Paulo, Bogota, Santiago, Buenos Aires and Mexico City.
- Servers can be automated through the API, SDKs, CLI and a Terraform provider.
- Current-generation AMD EPYC hardware runs alongside B300, RTX PRO 6000 and H100 GPU options.
Cons
- There is no managed WordPress, managed database or serverless offering, so you need operations expertise.
- Independent user reviews are scarce, and PeerSpot shows no reviews at all.
- Bandwidth overage rates and storage prices are not shown on the main pricing page.
- The Megaport acquisition may change the roadmap over time, although Latitude.sh says the brand and billing stay the same.
RTK-DC
Pros
- One of Russia's largest commercial data center networks, with about 25 Tier III sites cited in 2025
- Covers colocation through managed Kubernetes and six managed database engines from a single provider
- Offers GPU capacity on NVIDIA H200 for AI workloads
- A single cloud.rt.ru portal manages both colocation requests and cloud resources
Cons
- No public pricing, so every service needs a quote
- Focused on Russia, with little English-language documentation
- The company websites blocked automated access during research, which limited verification
- Little independent user review coverage on G2 or Capterra
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Latitude.sh scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 6.9/10 against 5.9/10 for RTK-DC. The largest gap is in Cost: 6/10 for Latitude.sh and 4/10 for RTK-DC.
No, neither Latitude.sh nor RTK-DC lists a free plan.
Latitude.sh is the better fit for startups: we rate it 7/10 for them, against 3/10 for RTK-DC.
