b stack radar

Keila vs Moosend: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of Keila and Moosend to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

Keila logo

Keila

5.8/10

Open-source, AGPL-licensed newsletter platform from Germany for sending email campaigns and running sign-up forms, available as an EU-hosted cloud service or self-hosted with Docker.

Moosend logo

Moosend

6.9/10

Winner

Email marketing and automation platform with a drag-and-drop builder, workflows, landing pages and forms, priced by contact count for small and mid-sized businesses.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Keila logo
Keila
Moosend logo
Moosend
Scores
Overall Rating5.8/106.9/10
Scalability5/106/10
Ease of Use6/108/10
Customization7/106/10
Security6/106/10
Support4/106/10
Cost9/109/10
Integration3/106/10
Analytics4/107/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid plan€8/mo
Keila XS
$9/mo
Pro
Estimated cost for 10 users€8/mo
Keila XS
Contact for pricing
Features
Email Marketing
Segmentation
A/B TestingNot listed
E-commerce FeaturesNot listed
Landing PagesNot listed

Keila vs Moosend cost by team size

Team sizeKeilaMoosend
1 user€8/moKeila XS$9/moPro
5 users€8/moKeila XS$9/moPro
10 users€8/moKeila XSContact for pricing
25 users€8/moKeila XSContact for pricing
50 users€8/moKeila XSContact for pricing

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Keila logo
Why choose Keila

  • Higher Customization score (7/10 vs 6/10)

Moosend logo
Why choose Moosend

  • Higher Integration score (6/10 vs 3/10)
  • Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 4/10)
  • Better fit for marketing teams (7/10 vs 4/10)
  • Better fit for mid-market (6/10 vs 3/10)

Pros & Cons

Keila logo
Keila

Pros

  • Fully open source under AGPLv3, with no proprietary premium features, so it can be self-hosted free with Docker.
  • Pricing is based on emails sent and every plan includes unlimited contacts, which helps large lists that send rarely.
  • The cloud is hosted in Germany and France, which suits organisations with GDPR concerns.
  • Several editing modes are available, including a block editor, Markdown, MJML and plain text, plus Liquid personalisation.
  • Mail can go out through your own SMTP, SES, Mailgun, Postmark or SendGrid account.

Cons

  • There is no free cloud plan, and pricing is listed only for monthly billing.
  • Automation is basic, and the template library is small, according to comparison reviews.
  • There are few integrations, and the Zapier connector is still in private beta.
  • No security certifications are published.
  • It has no e-commerce, SMS or landing page builder features.

Moosend logo
Moosend

Pros

  • Entry price is low: Pro was reported at 9 USD per month for 500 contacts, and annual billing takes 20% off.
  • Prebuilt automation recipes include abandoned cart, repeat purchase and loyalty flows driven by website tracking.
  • A/B campaigns can test subject line, content or sender, then send the winner to the rest of the list automatically.
  • Nonprofits get an extra 25% off on top of the annual discount.
  • Capterra reviewers rate it highly overall and often praise the support team.

Cons

  • Transactional email, dedicated IPs and SSO are not in Pro and need a custom-priced plan.
  • Support is 24/5 email and live chat. The Enterprise tier adds priority support, but there is no 24/7 coverage.
  • About 80 native integrations, so less common tools need Zapier or similar connectors.
  • Reviewers find the template range limited and the landing pages fairly basic.
  • Prices are only in US dollars, and there is no permanent free plan, only a 30-day trial.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Moosend scores higher on our Marketing criteria: 6.9/10 against 5.8/10 for Keila. The largest gap is in Analytics: 4/10 for Keila and 7/10 for Moosend.

No, neither Keila nor Moosend lists a free plan.

Moosend is the better fit for marketing teams: we rate it 7/10 for them, against 4/10 for Keila.

Related Comparisons