Inspectivity vs Quick Terrain Modeler: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Inspectivity and Quick Terrain Modeler to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Inspectivity
6.5/10
Inspectivity is a no-code cloud and mobile platform from Perth that lets energy, mining and engineering teams run digital inspections, track issues and model asset hierarchies.
Quick Terrain Modeler
5.7/10
Quick Terrain Modeler is Windows desktop software from Applied Imagery for viewing, analyzing and exploiting LiDAR and other 3D point cloud and terrain data.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.5/10 | 5.7/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | A$75/user/mo Essentials | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | A$600/mo Professional | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Asset Registry | Not listed | |
| GIS and Mapping | Not listed | |
| Inspection Checklists | Not listed | |
| LiDAR Processing | Not listed | |
| Offline Field App | Not listed | |
| Safety and Compliance | Not listed | |
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
Inspectivity vs Quick Terrain Modeler cost by team size
| Team size | Inspectivity | Quick Terrain Modeler |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | A$75/moEssentials | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | A$600/moProfessional | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | A$600/moProfessional | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | A$600/moProfessional | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | A$600/moProfessional | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Inspectivity
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Quick Terrain Modeler
- Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Inspectivity
Pros
- The no-code form builder lets teams build their own inspection templates with measurements, text fields and photos, with no developer needed.
- The mobile app works offline, which suits remote mine and energy sites.
- The company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certifications, and Enterprise offers single-tenant hosting.
- A 14-day free trial needs no credit card, and Essentials starts at AUD 75 per month.
Cons
- API, SSO and BI integration are only available on the Enterprise plan.
- Essentials is tightly capped at one project, 1,000 items and three templates.
- There are few independent reviews to judge it by.
- It is not a full CMMS, and spare parts and maintenance scheduling are not clearly offered.
Quick Terrain Modeler
Pros
- Handles large point clouds quickly for loading, rendering and analysis, according to the vendor
- Takes data from many sensors, including LiDAR, photogrammetry, radar, sonar and full motion video, in one scene
- Has a long history with defense and intelligence users, including NGA maintenance contracts
- Still being developed, with version 8.4.4 released in May 2026
- Free trial lets buyers test it before asking for a quote
Cons
- No public pricing; every purchase goes through a quote
- Runs only on Windows desktops
- Very few independent user reviews on the major review sites
- Not built for asset management, maintenance or field workflows
Not sold on either?
Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Inspectivity scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.5/10 against 5.7/10 for Quick Terrain Modeler. The largest gap is in Customization: 8/10 for Inspectivity and 5/10 for Quick Terrain Modeler.
No, neither Inspectivity nor Quick Terrain Modeler lists a free plan.
