Inspectivity vs Neara: Complete Comparison (2026)

Why choose Inspectivity

• Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 3/10)
• Higher Security score (7/10 vs 6/10)

Why choose Neara

• Higher Analytics score (9/10 vs 6/10)
• Higher Scalability score (9/10 vs 6/10)

Inspectivity

Pros

• The no-code form builder lets teams build their own inspection templates with measurements, text fields and photos, with no developer needed.
• The mobile app works offline, which suits remote mine and energy sites.
• The company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certifications, and Enterprise offers single-tenant hosting.
• A 14-day free trial needs no credit card, and Essentials starts at AUD 75 per month.

Cons

• API, SSO and BI integration are only available on the Enterprise plan.
• Essentials is tightly capped at one project, 1,000 items and three templates.
• There are few independent reviews to judge it by.
• It is not a full CMMS, and spare parts and maintenance scheduling are not clearly offered.

Neara

Pros

• Physics-based simulation of wind, ice, thermal and flood loading on real network geometry, beyond simple clearance checks
• Reuses a utility's existing LiDAR, imagery and GIS data instead of requiring new capture
• Strong customer evidence, including close to 90 percent of Australian network utilities and large US and European utilities
• Reported results such as reassessing condemned poles, cutting planned replacements from 25,000 to 4,000 at one US utility
• Brings planning, design, vegetation and wildfire workflows into one model

Cons

• No public pricing, and sold only as an enterprise agreement
• Narrowly built for overhead electric networks
• Results depend on the quality and coverage of the LiDAR or imagery data
• Almost no independent user reviews on G2, Capterra or Reddit