IMS PEI vs Inspectivity (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Inspectivity is our pick, scoring 6.5/10 against 6.4/10 for IMS PEI on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Cost score (6/10 vs 3/10). Neither IMS PEI nor Inspectivity lists a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
IMS PEI
6.4/10
Cloud-based pressure equipment integrity software from Cenosco that plans inspections using risk-based inspection (RBI) and corrosion calculations, for oil, gas, chemicals and process plants.
Inspectivity
6.5/10
Inspectivity is a no-code cloud and mobile platform from Perth that lets energy, mining and engineering teams run digital inspections, track issues and model asset hierarchies.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.4/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 3/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | A$75/user/mo Essentials |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | A$600/mo Professional |
| Features | ||
| Asset Registry | ||
| Inspection Checklists | ||
| Offline Field App | ||
| Safety and Compliance | ||
| Predictive Maintenance | Not listed | |
| SCADA and IoT Integration | Not listed | |
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
IMS PEI vs Inspectivity cost by team size
| Team size | IMS PEI | Inspectivity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | A$75/moEssentials |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | A$600/moProfessional |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | A$600/moProfessional |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | A$600/moProfessional |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | A$600/moProfessional |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who IMS PEI and Inspectivity suit
| Audience | IMS PEI | Inspectivity |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance Teams | 7/10Inspection and integrity engineers use it to schedule inspections and record equipment condition, though maintenance work itself runs in a connected CMMS. | 8/10It is built for HSE and maintenance teams that run asset inspections and close out issues. |
| Energy Companies | 9/10It was built with Shell and is deployed at refineries, LNG plants and upstream operators such as NAM, Tüpraş and Thaioil. | 9/10The vendor targets energy, mining and utilities and names Santos as a customer. |
| Construction | Not rated | 6/10Construction and engineering are listed among the target industries. |
| Engineering Firms | Not rated | 7/10It supports discipline inspections plus commissioning and completions work. |
| Enterprise | 8/10It suits large asset owners, with ERP integration to SAP and Maximo, SSO and ISO 27001-certified hosting. | Not rated |
| Field Teams | Not rated | 8/10The mobile app works offline and captures photos in the field. |
| Manufacturing | 7/10Cenosco also targets chemicals and pulp and paper plants that run pressure equipment. | Not rated |
| Small Business | 2/10Quote-based enterprise pricing and the need for implementation services make it a poor fit for small firms. | Not rated |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose IMS PEI
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Scalability score (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Inspectivity
- Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
IMS PEI
Pros
- Supports both Shell's S-RBI method and API 581, from qualitative to fully quantitative, so one tool can handle risk ranking across a whole plant.
- Rests on more than 20 years of joint development with Shell, and Cenosco reports use on more than 200 assets in over 40 countries.
- Interfaces with SAP, JD Edwards and Maximo, so inspection findings can feed maintenance execution in the ERP.
- The IMS4Field app works offline by default, and NAM reports going paperless while staying auditable.
- Hosted on Microsoft Azure, with ISO 27001:2022 certification and 2FA or SSO/ADFS authentication.
Cons
- No public pricing. Buyers need a sales process and typically pay for implementation and data migration services.
- Independent reviews are almost nonexistent: Capterra shows a single rating, and other listings have none.
- It focuses on inspection and integrity, not a full CMMS, so work order execution and spare parts usually stay in a separate ERP.
- Cenosco itself advises against on-premise hosting, which may not suit operators with strict data residency rules.
- The older IMS Offline app was deprecated in 2024, so sites still on it had to move to IMS4Field.
Inspectivity
Pros
- The no-code form builder lets teams build their own inspection templates with measurements, text fields and photos, with no developer needed.
- The mobile app works offline, which suits remote mine and energy sites.
- The company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certifications, and Enterprise offers single-tenant hosting.
- A 14-day free trial needs no credit card, and Essentials starts at AUD 75 per month.
Cons
- API, SSO and BI integration are only available on the Enterprise plan.
- Essentials is tightly capped at one project, 1,000 items and three templates.
- There are few independent reviews to judge it by.
- It is not a full CMMS, and spare parts and maintenance scheduling are not clearly offered.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Inspectivity scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.5/10 against 6.4/10 for IMS PEI. The largest gap is in Cost: 3/10 for IMS PEI and 6/10 for Inspectivity.
No, neither IMS PEI nor Inspectivity lists a free plan.
