Hover vs Inspectivity (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Hover and Inspectivity both score 6.5/10 on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. Only Hover has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
Hover
6.5/10
Hover turns smartphone photos of a building into a measured 3D model. Exterior contractors, builders and insurance adjusters use it to measure, design, estimate and document claims.
Inspectivity
6.5/10
Inspectivity is a no-code cloud and mobile platform from Perth that lets energy, mining and engineering teams run digital inspections, track issues and model asset hierarchies.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Security | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | A$75/user/mo Essentials |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | A$600/mo Professional |
| Features | ||
| Inspection Checklists | ||
| Offline Field App | ||
| Asset Registry | Not listed | |
| Digital Twin | Not listed | |
| Inspection Automation | Not listed | |
| Safety and Compliance | Not listed | |
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
Hover vs Inspectivity cost by team size
| Team size | Hover | Inspectivity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | A$75/moEssentials |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | A$600/moProfessional |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | A$600/moProfessional |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | A$600/moProfessional |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | A$600/moProfessional |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Hover and Inspectivity suit
Hover fits construction better than Inspectivity.
| Audience | Hover | Inspectivity |
|---|---|---|
| Construction | 9/10Built for exterior contractors, roofers, siding companies and home builders, who use it to measure, design and estimate. | 6/10Construction and engineering are listed among the target industries. |
| Field Teams | 7/10Crews capture on a phone, can work in low-signal areas, and get guided photo checklists. | 8/10The mobile app works offline and captures photos in the field. |
| Energy Companies | Not rated | 9/10The vendor targets energy, mining and utilities and names Santos as a customer. |
| Engineering Firms | Not rated | 7/10It supports discipline inspections plus commissioning and completions work. |
| Enterprise | 6/10The Enterprise tier adds multi-org management, full SSO, advanced permissions, custom catalogs and invoicing. | Not rated |
| Financial Services | 6/10Insurance carriers and adjusters use its claim inspections and Xactimate imports, though one reviewer found EagleView stronger for insurance roof work. | Not rated |
| Maintenance Teams | Not rated | 8/10It is built for HSE and maintenance teams that run asset inspections and close out issues. |
| Small Business | 7/10The pay-per-project Starter plan, with three free projects and no subscription, suits low-volume contractors. | Not rated |
| Utilities | 2/10It models individual buildings rather than networks or infrastructure assets. | Not rated |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Hover
- Has a free plan (Inspectivity does not)
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for construction (9/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Inspectivity
- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Hover
Pros
- Works from eight or so phone photos, so it can measure tree-covered lots and new construction where aerial imagery struggles.
- Models the whole exterior (roof, walls, windows, doors, trim), which suits siding and painting contractors as well as roofers.
- Starter has no subscription and the first three projects are free, which makes it cheap for low-volume shops to try.
- Every plan includes unlimited users, so larger crews pay no per-seat fees.
- Connects to AccuLynx, JobNimbus, ServiceTitan, Salesforce, Xactimate and supplier pricing from ABC Supply and SRS, and has an OAuth 2.0 API.
- Capterra users rate it highly, 4.8 out of 5, and often praise the 3D visualization during sales visits.
Cons
- Someone has to be at the property to take photos, so it cannot produce measurements before a visit or for storm canvassing.
- Per-project fees continue on Pro and Business, which raises costs for high-volume production shops.
- Contractor ToolStack's review found EagleView stronger for adjuster-driven insurance roof claims, and the Xactimate link works through ESX export.
- Reviewers in early 2026 reported sync lag and changes to takeoff formats during the move to the new connected platform.
- Some users report measurements off by up to 10 percent, or failed models when corner photos are missing.
- No SOC 2 or ISO certifications are publicly listed, and the trust center shows no details.
Inspectivity
Pros
- The no-code form builder lets teams build their own inspection templates with measurements, text fields and photos, with no developer needed.
- The mobile app works offline, which suits remote mine and energy sites.
- The company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certifications, and Enterprise offers single-tenant hosting.
- A 14-day free trial needs no credit card, and Essentials starts at AUD 75 per month.
Cons
- API, SSO and BI integration are only available on the Enterprise plan.
- Essentials is tightly capped at one project, 1,000 items and three templates.
- There are few independent reviews to judge it by.
- It is not a full CMMS, and spare parts and maintenance scheduling are not clearly offered.
Not sold on either?
Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Hover and Inspectivity both score 6.5/10 on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. The largest gap is in Customization: 6/10 for Hover and 8/10 for Inspectivity.
Hover has a free plan; Inspectivity does not list one.
Hover is the better fit for construction: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 6/10 for Inspectivity.
