HaloPSA vs Harvest: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of HaloPSA and Harvest to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
HaloPSA
7.1/10
HaloPSA is a professional services automation platform for managed service providers and IT service teams. It combines ticketing, projects, time tracking, billing and reporting.
Harvest
6/10
Harvest is a time tracking, project budgeting and invoicing tool for agencies, consultancies and service teams that bill clients for their time.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.1/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 4/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Integration | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | £66/user/mo Halo (single plan) | $11/user/mo Teams |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | $110/mo Teams |
| Features | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Dashboards | ||
| Reporting | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| Gantt charts | Not listed | |
| Kanban boards | Not listed | |
| Knowledge base | Not listed | |
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | Not listed | |
HaloPSA vs Harvest cost by team size
| Team size | HaloPSA | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | FreeFree |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | $55/moTeams |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | $110/moTeams |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | $275/moTeams |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | $550/moTeams |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose HaloPSA
- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Scalability score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for mid-market (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Includes Scheduling, which Harvest lacks
Why choose Harvest
- Has a free plan (HaloPSA does not)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for freelancers (7/10 vs 2/10)
- Better fit for consultancies (8/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
HaloPSA
Pros
- One per-agent plan includes every module and the AI features, with no paid add-ons.
- Portal customers and end users are free, so client collaboration does not add licence cost.
- More than 250 integrations, including accounting and RMM tools, are included at no extra charge.
- Broad compliance coverage includes ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP and HIPAA, plus SSO and audit logs.
- Reviewers describe the browser interface as modern and fast.
Cons
- Reviewers say the configuration menus are convoluted, and a consultant is often needed to get the most out of it.
- A paid onboarding package is mandatory and its price is not published.
- The project features are oriented toward IT service delivery rather than complex professional services projects.
- Some users report slowness and weaker calendar, notification and stock-control features.
- Per-agent costs add up for larger teams.
Harvest
Pros
- Time entries flow straight into client invoices, and the billing integrations include QuickBooks Online, Xero, Stripe and PayPal.
- About 68 listed integrations, including Asana, Jira, Trello, ClickUp, Linear, Slack and Zapier, plus a public API.
- A free forever plan with invoicing for a single freelancer.
- Enterprise adds timesheet approvals, profitability reporting and SAML SSO for firms that need tighter control.
- A 30-day trial of the paid plans with no credit card required.
Cons
- Since the Bending Spoons acquisition, usage-based fees with undisclosed rates have produced reported bill increases of 1,500 percent or more.
- No Gantt charts or kanban boards, and you cannot assign tasks to individuals, so it does not replace a project management tool.
- Scheduling needs the separately billed Forecast app.
- You cannot remove seats mid-cycle, and data is stored only in the US.
- Reviewers mention manual steps when matching timesheets to invoices, and reminders that arrive too late.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
HaloPSA scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 7.1/10 against 6/10 for Harvest. The largest gap is in Customization: 9/10 for HaloPSA and 4/10 for Harvest.
Harvest has a free plan; HaloPSA does not list one.
Harvest is the better fit for freelancers: we rate it 7/10 for them, against 2/10 for HaloPSA.
HaloPSA has Scheduling, which Harvest lacks.
