FloQast vs Rillet (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Rillet is our pick, scoring 6.8/10 against 6.4/10 for FloQast on our AI Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 6/10). Neither FloQast nor Rillet lists a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
FloQast
6.4/10
FloQast is close management software that helps corporate accounting teams run month-end checklists, reconcile accounts, automate journal entries with AI, and manage SOX controls.
Rillet
6.8/10
AI-native ERP and general ledger for SaaS and subscription companies that automates the month-end close, revenue recognition, and multi-entity consolidation.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.4/10 | 6.8/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Cost | 3/10 | 4/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Corporate Cards | Not listed | |
| Invoicing | ||
| Multi-entity Consolidation | ||
| Audit Trail | ||
| Payroll | Not listed | |
| General Ledger | ||
| Bank Reconciliation | ||
| Accountant Access | Not listed | |
| Budgeting and Forecasting | Not listed | |
| Financial Reporting | Not listed | |
| Inventory Accounting | Not listed | |
| Accounts Payable | Not listed | |
| Multi-currency | Not listed | |
Who FloQast and Rillet suit
| Audience | FloQast | Rillet |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-Market | 9/10Pricing and the way it layers on an ERP fit mid-market companies with several entities. | 8/10Analysts position it for mid-market companies moving off NetSuite or Sage Intacct. |
| Finance Teams | 9/10The product is built for controllers and corporate accounting teams that run the month-end close. | 9/10It automates the close, reconciliations, and accruals for in-house accountants and controllers. |
| Accountants and Bookkeepers | Not rated | 6/10Top accounting firms such as Armanino and Wiss partner with Rillet, and it has an Accountant role. |
| E-commerce | Not rated | 2/10It has no inventory or order management. |
| Enterprise | 7/10It offers SOX controls and connectors for SAP and Workday, but reviewers say very complex multi-entity setups may favour BlackLine. | Not rated |
| Manufacturing | Not rated | 1/10It has no inventory or manufacturing modules. |
| SaaS Companies | Not rated | 10/10It is built around SaaS revenue recognition, usage billing, and ARR and MRR metrics. |
| Small Business | 2/10Contracts start around $12,000 a year and it needs an ERP, so it does not fit small firms. | Not rated |
| Startups | Not rated | 8/10It targets venture-backed, fast-scaling startups. Windsurf, for example, runs finance with a two-person team. |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose FloQast
Our data shows no clear advantage over Rillet.
Why choose Rillet
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Support score (9/10 vs 8/10)
- Includes Invoicing, which FloQast lacks
- Includes General Ledger, which FloQast lacks
Pros & Cons
FloQast
Pros
- Its spreadsheet-style interface tied to Excel workbooks shortens onboarding for teams moving off manual close checklists.
- Assigning preparers, reviewers and deadlines on the checklist, with live dashboards, makes team accountability clear.
- Sign-offs and documentation are logged, which helps with auditor requests.
- It integrates with major ERPs including NetSuite, SAP, Workday, Microsoft, Sage Intacct and Xero.
- Its own blog announces SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certification.
- It has strong review ratings, including about 4.6 out of 5 on G2 from more than 1,400 reviews, with support often praised.
Cons
- No public pricing. Third-party data suggests contracts of $12,000 to $150,000 or more a year, plus implementation fees.
- AI transaction matching (AutoRec) has been sold at extra cost, according to third-party pricing reports.
- It mostly pulls balance-level data, so reviewers say discrepancies are investigated back in the ERP.
- Some reviewers report slow load times when uploading reconciliation files at peak close.
- Third-party reports describe multi-year, auto-renewing contracts that are billed annually.
Rillet
Pros
- G2 reviewers rate it about 4.9 out of 5 and most often praise the time it saves on close and reconciliation work.
- Native ASC 606 revenue recognition and usage-based billing remove the need for separate billing or revenue tools for SaaS companies.
- Its pricing page quotes 4 to 6 weeks to implement, compared with many months for NetSuite or Sage Intacct.
- Built-in SaaS metrics include ARR and MRR waterfalls, NRR, burn, and runway.
- Holds SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II reports, and supports period locks and tiered approval workflows.
Cons
- No public subscription pricing, and implementation costs 10,000 to 30,000 USD.
- Covers financials only, with no inventory, manufacturing, purchase orders, or three-way matching.
- Young product, launched in 2024, with a small partner ecosystem and a short track record with heavily regulated filers.
- A few G2 reviewers cite a learning curve and reliance on third-party integrations such as Rippling.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Rillet scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.4/10 for FloQast. The largest gap is in Analytics: 6/10 for FloQast and 8/10 for Rillet.
No, neither FloQast nor Rillet lists a free plan.
Rillet has Invoicing and General Ledger, which FloQast lacks.
