FigJam vs Jira Comparison
Compare FigJam vs Jira features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
FigJam
6.8/10
FigJam is Figma's online whiteboard for team brainstorming, diagramming, workshops and lightweight project planning, sold through Figma seats.
Jira
7.3/10
Atlassian's work and issue-tracking platform for planning, tracking, and shipping projects, with scrum and kanban boards built mainly for software and technical teams.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.8/10 | 7.3/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 9/10 | 4/10 |
| Analytics | 2/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | $3/user/mo Professional (Collab seat) | $8/user/mo Standard |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Starter | Free Free |
| Features | ||
| Workflow automation | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Timeline view | ||
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| Dashboards | Not listed | |
| Kanban boards | Not listed | |
| Reporting | Not listed | |
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Time tracking | Not listed | |
| Whiteboards | Not listed | |
FigJam vs Jira cost by team size
FigJam and Jira cost the same up to 10 users; FigJam costs less from 25 users.
| Team size | FigJam | Jira |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeStarter | FreeFree |
| 5 users | FreeStarter | FreeFree |
| 10 users | FreeStarter | FreeFree |
| 25 users | FreeStarter | $212/moStandard |
| 50 users | FreeStarter | $424/moStandard |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose FigJam
- Higher Ease of Use score (9/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for remote teams (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Jira
- Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 2/10)
- Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for developers (10/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 7/10)
- Includes Workflow automation, which FigJam lacks
Pros & Cons
FigJam
Pros
- Most teams pick it up quickly, and reviewers on Capterra and G2 (4.6/5) praise how easy it is to learn
- More than 300 templates for retros, standups, kickoffs and Gantt-style plans cut setup time
- External guests can join free for 24 hours without logging in
- The Collab seat costs only $3 to $5 per user per month
- AI can generate diagrams and templates, cluster stickies and summarize sessions into action items
Cons
- It is not a full project management tool: it has no dashboards, reporting, time tracking or workflow automation
- Reviewers report limited export options
- Performance can slow down on large boards
- It has no offline mode
- Seats are tied to Figma licensing, so the overall pricing structure is complex
Jira
Pros
- The free plan supports up to 10 users and includes scrum and kanban boards.
- Reviewers highlight deep customization of workflows, boards, and fields.
- Sprint and agile management are strong, and Jira integrates with GitHub and Git tools.
- It links closely with Confluence and other Atlassian products, so tickets can be referenced across those apps.
- Time tracking is built into every plan, including Free.
Cons
- Reviewers report a steep learning curve and an interface that overwhelms non-technical users.
- Users report slow issue loading and laggy boards in large deployments.
- Paid Marketplace apps can add hidden costs for reporting, CRM, and helpdesk needs.
- The free plan is limited to 100 emails per day and community support only.
- Troubleshooting failed automation rules can be frustrating.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Jira scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 7.3/10 against 6.8/10 for FigJam. The largest gap is in Analytics: 2/10 for FigJam and 7/10 for Jira.
Both are free for 10 users.
Yes, both FigJam and Jira have a free plan.
Jira is the better fit for developers: we rate it 10/10 for them, against 6/10 for FigJam.
Jira has Workflow automation, which FigJam lacks.
