Everhour vs Orangescrum: Complete Comparison (2026)

Why choose Everhour

• Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 5/10)
• Better fit for consultancies (8/10 vs 6/10)

Why choose Orangescrum

• Higher Customization score (6/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Scalability score (7/10 vs 6/10)
• Better fit for enterprise (6/10 vs 4/10)

Everhour

Pros

• More than 20 native integrations, including Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Jira and Linear, put a timer directly on tasks, and reviewers praise these integrations most.
• A browser extension adds tracking to more than 20 other web apps, such as Figma, HubSpot and Zendesk.
• Budgets with alerts, expense tracking and invoicing that syncs to QuickBooks, Xero or FreshBooks cover billable work end to end.
• The Team plan costs 8.50 USD per seat per month on yearly billing, and the free plan covers up to 5 seats.
• Reviewers often single out the customer support, and Everhour holds about a 4.8 out of 5 average across 139 SpotSaaS ratings.

Cons

• It is not a standalone PM suite: it has no Gantt charts, docs or whiteboards.
• The free plan has no integrations, which are the product's main value.
• Paid plans require 5 seats and payment by card only, and unused time is not refunded when you cancel.
• Its security documentation relies on AWS's SOC 2 compliance rather than its own report, and it does not run formal periodic risk assessments.
• Some users report hours that failed to record, too many reminder alerts, and limited chart-style reporting.

Orangescrum

Pros

• Cloud plans charge a flat monthly fee with unlimited users, so costs do not grow with headcount.
• A self-hosted edition supports on-premises and air-gapped deployment for teams whose data must stay in-house.
• Reviewers praise detailed time tracking, including billable and non-billable hours, with timesheet approval.
• Agile tools such as sprints, backlogs and burndown charts sit alongside Gantt charts and critical path analysis.
• Reviewers on Techjockey rate it highly for value for money (4.9 out of 5).

Cons

• Reviewers describe the interface as dense, dated or overwhelming, and say beginners need time to learn it.
• Some users report slowness, bugs, filter problems and slow support.
• SSO, LDAP and two-factor authentication are only included in Enterprise.
• The free plan is limited to one user and one project.
• The vendor does not publish compliance certifications such as SOC 2.