EHS Insight vs Hover (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Hover is our pick, scoring 6.5/10 against 6.3/10 for EHS Insight on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (7/10 vs 6/10). Only Hover has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026

EHS Insight
6.3/10
A cloud-based, modular platform for environment, health and safety work. It covers incidents, audits, permits, risk assessments, training and ESG reporting for industrial organisations.

Hover
6.5/10
Hover turns smartphone photos of a building into a measured 3D model. Exterior contractors, builders and insurance adjusters use it to measure, design, estimate and document claims.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.3/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Inspection Checklists | ||
| Offline Field App | ||
| Digital Twin | Not listed | |
| Document Control | Not listed | |
| Inspection Automation | Not listed | |
| Safety and Compliance | Not listed | |
Who EHS Insight and Hover suit
EHS Insight fits utilities better; Hover fits construction better.
| Audience | EHS Insight | Hover |
|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 6/10Utilities appear in the vendor's industry list, but the product has no network asset or GIS features. | 2/10It models individual buildings rather than networks or infrastructure assets. |
| Construction | 7/10Construction and engineering is a listed target industry, and the offline mobile inspections and job safety analysis suit jobsite use. | 9/10Built for exterior contractors, roofers, siding companies and home builders, who use it to measure, design and estimate. |
| Field Teams | 7/10The native iOS and Android apps support offline inspections and incident reporting that sync later. | 7/10Crews capture on a phone, can work in low-signal areas, and get guided photo checklists. |
| Energy Companies | 8/10Oil, gas and energy are core target industries, and journey management, permits and stormwater modules suit field-heavy energy operations. | Not rated |
| Enterprise | Not rated | 6/10The Enterprise tier adds multi-org management, full SSO, advanced permissions, custom catalogs and invoicing. |
| Financial Services | Not rated | 6/10Insurance carriers and adjusters use its claim inspections and Xactimate imports, though one reviewer found EagleView stronger for insurance roof work. |
| Government | 5/10The public sector is a listed industry, but the vendor states the platform is not FedRAMP certified. | Not rated |
| Manufacturing | 8/10Manufacturing and industrial firms are the first industry the vendor targets. Its modules for incidents, audits, chemicals and permits match plant safety programs. | Not rated |
| Mid-Market | 7/10Pricing starts around $5,000 per year with modules licensed separately, which suits mid-sized EHS teams. Enterprise rollouts take months. | Not rated |
| Small Business | Not rated | 7/10The pay-per-project Starter plan, with three free projects and no subscription, suits low-volume contractors. |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose EHS Insight

- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for utilities (6/10 vs 2/10)
Why choose Hover

- Has a free plan (EHS Insight does not)
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for construction (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
EHS Insight

Pros
- The module catalogue is broad: more than 30 modules covering safety, health, training, chemicals and SDS, waste, ESG and compliance, so one vendor can replace several point tools.
- Modules are sold separately, so a team can start with one module, such as incident management or CAPA, and add others later.
- The native iOS and Android apps let field workers run inspections and log incidents offline, and the data syncs when they reconnect.
- Enterprise identity options are wide: SSO with Entra ID, Okta, ADFS, OneLogin, Google Workspace or SAML, plus LDAP. The vendor states it holds ISO 27001 certification.
- Review scores are solid: 4.4 out of 5 from 59 ratings on Capterra, about 4.6 to 4.7 on G2, and high marks for customer service.
- AI features include an embedded assistant and an MCP connector for querying EHS data from Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot.
Cons
- It is not a maintenance or asset management system. It has no work orders, preventive maintenance or asset registry for equipment upkeep.
- Reviewers say building new reports and changing standard fields is difficult, and the reporting is inflexible.
- G2 reviewers mention slow performance with large reports and when navigating on mobile.
- The vendor estimates enterprise implementation at 3 to 9 months, and setup can be complex for large organisations.
- Prices beyond the $5,000 per year starting point, and the cost of support packages, are only available by quote.
- The product is cloud-only, with no on-premises option, and the vendor says it is not FedRAMP certified.
Hover

Pros
- Works from eight or so phone photos, so it can measure tree-covered lots and new construction where aerial imagery struggles.
- Models the whole exterior (roof, walls, windows, doors, trim), which suits siding and painting contractors as well as roofers.
- Starter has no subscription and the first three projects are free, which makes it cheap for low-volume shops to try.
- Every plan includes unlimited users, so larger crews pay no per-seat fees.
- Connects to AccuLynx, JobNimbus, ServiceTitan, Salesforce, Xactimate and supplier pricing from ABC Supply and SRS, and has an OAuth 2.0 API.
- Capterra users rate it highly, 4.8 out of 5, and often praise the 3D visualization during sales visits.
Cons
- Someone has to be at the property to take photos, so it cannot produce measurements before a visit or for storm canvassing.
- Per-project fees continue on Pro and Business, which raises costs for high-volume production shops.
- Contractor ToolStack's review found EagleView stronger for adjuster-driven insurance roof claims, and the Xactimate link works through ESX export.
- Reviewers in early 2026 reported sync lag and changes to takeoff formats during the move to the new connected platform.
- Some users report measurements off by up to 10 percent, or failed models when corner photos are missing.
- No SOC 2 or ISO certifications are publicly listed, and the trust center shows no details.
Not sold on either?

Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Hover scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.5/10 against 6.3/10 for EHS Insight. The largest gap is in Security: 7/10 for EHS Insight and 5/10 for Hover.
Hover has a free plan; EHS Insight does not list one.
EHS Insight is the better fit for utilities: we rate it 6/10 for them, against 2/10 for Hover.


