Crusoe Cloud vs Vast.ai: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Crusoe Cloud and Vast.ai to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026

Crusoe Cloud
6.6/10
Crusoe Cloud is a GPU-focused AI cloud that offers NVIDIA and AMD GPU instances, managed Kubernetes, storage and managed inference to AI teams and enterprises.

Vast.ai
6.3/10
Vast.ai is a marketplace for renting GPU compute by the second from independent hosts and data centers, used for AI training, inference, and rendering.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 6.3/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 4/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | ||
| Serverless Functions | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Multiple Regions | Not listed | |
| Git Deployments | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Crusoe Cloud

- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Analytics score (5/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Includes Uptime SLA, which Vast.ai lacks
Why choose Vast.ai

- Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Crusoe Cloud

Pros
- SemiAnalysis gave it a ClusterMAX Gold rating and praised how easy the console is to use, along with its fault management.
- Reviewers describe hands-on, white-glove engineering support.
- It covers NVIDIA H100 through B300 and AMD MI355X GPUs, with InfiniBand clusters.
- CPU, storage and Kubernetes rates are published openly, for example $0.10 per Kubernetes cluster-hour.
- Developers get a CLI, a Terraform provider, an API and an MCP server for automation.
Cons
- There are few independent user reviews on G2, Capterra or Gartner.
- It has fewer managed services and a narrower geographic footprint than the hyperscalers.
- Self-serve GPU rates on the pricing page are set to rise from December 1, 2026.
- Service terms reportedly exclude HIPAA-regulated workloads.
Vast.ai

Pros
- Marketplace rates for H100 and RTX 4090 run well below RunPod, Lambda, and AWS in mid-2026 reviews
- Per-second billing with no contracts or minimum hours
- Wide hardware choice across 68+ GPU types and 40+ data centers
- Secure Cloud filter limits results to vetted ISO 27001 data center hosts
Cons
- Reliability varies by host, and reviewers report disconnections
- No platform uptime SLA on standard marketplace instances
- Reviewers describe support as limited and inconsistent
- Storage is billed while instances are stopped, and bandwidth costs extra, which raises the real cost
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Crusoe Cloud scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.6/10 against 6.3/10 for Vast.ai. The largest gap is in Support: 8/10 for Crusoe Cloud and 4/10 for Vast.ai.
No, neither Crusoe Cloud nor Vast.ai lists a free plan.
Crusoe Cloud is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 4/10 for Vast.ai.
Crusoe Cloud has Uptime SLA, which Vast.ai lacks.





