Cloud.ru vs Crusoe Cloud Comparison
Compare Cloud.ru vs Crusoe Cloud features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Cloud.ru
6/10
Russian cloud provider, formerly SberCloud, that offers virtual machines, Kubernetes, object storage, managed databases and AI services to Russian businesses and public-sector organisations.
Crusoe Cloud
6.6/10
Crusoe Cloud is a GPU-focused AI cloud that offers NVIDIA and AMD GPU instances, managed Kubernetes, storage and managed inference to AI teams and enterprises.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | RUB 641/mo Small Workload VM | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free Tier | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| Serverless Functions | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
Cloud.ru vs Crusoe Cloud cost by team size
| Team size | Cloud.ru | Crusoe Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree Tier | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | FreeFree Tier | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | FreeFree Tier | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | FreeFree Tier | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | FreeFree Tier | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Cloud.ru
- Has a free plan (Crusoe Cloud does not)
- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Crusoe Cloud
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for developers (8/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Cloud.ru
Pros
- Nine Tier III data centers in Russia support data-localisation requirements
- Certified for personal data, state information systems and critical information infrastructure workloads
- Broad catalogue of more than 120 services, including managed Kubernetes, databases and an AI model platform
- Free Tier and a bonus for new users make testing low-cost
- Terraform provider and public API support infrastructure-as-code
Cons
- All regions are in Russia, so it does not suit global latency or residency needs
- No traditional shared hosting, cPanel or bundled email and domain plans
- CLI and Python SDK were only announced as coming soon
- Few independent user reviews exist, and most coverage is promotional
- Exact data center locations are not published
Crusoe Cloud
Pros
- SemiAnalysis gave it a ClusterMAX Gold rating and praised how easy the console is to use, along with its fault management.
- Reviewers describe hands-on, white-glove engineering support.
- It covers NVIDIA H100 through B300 and AMD MI355X GPUs, with InfiniBand clusters.
- CPU, storage and Kubernetes rates are published openly, for example $0.10 per Kubernetes cluster-hour.
- Developers get a CLI, a Terraform provider, an API and an MCP server for automation.
Cons
- There are few independent user reviews on G2, Capterra or Gartner.
- It has fewer managed services and a narrower geographic footprint than the hyperscalers.
- Self-serve GPU rates on the pricing page are set to rise from December 1, 2026.
- Service terms reportedly exclude HIPAA-regulated workloads.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Crusoe Cloud scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.6/10 against 6/10 for Cloud.ru. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 5/10 for Cloud.ru and 7/10 for Crusoe Cloud.
Cloud.ru has a free plan; Crusoe Cloud does not list one.
Crusoe Cloud is the better fit for developers: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 6/10 for Cloud.ru.
