Crusoe Cloud vs MWS Cloud: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Crusoe Cloud and MWS Cloud to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Crusoe Cloud
6.6/10
Crusoe Cloud is a GPU-focused AI cloud that offers NVIDIA and AMD GPU instances, managed Kubernetes, storage and managed inference to AI teams and enterprises.
MWS Cloud
4.9/10
MWS Cloud is the public cloud from the Russian telecom MTS. It offers virtual machines, Kubernetes, managed databases, storage, CDN and security services to Russian businesses.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 4.9/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 4/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Object Storage | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Multiple Regions | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Crusoe Cloud
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for developers (8/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose MWS Cloud
- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Crusoe Cloud
Pros
- SemiAnalysis gave it a ClusterMAX Gold rating and praised how easy the console is to use, along with its fault management.
- Reviewers describe hands-on, white-glove engineering support.
- It covers NVIDIA H100 through B300 and AMD MI355X GPUs, with InfiniBand clusters.
- CPU, storage and Kubernetes rates are published openly, for example $0.10 per Kubernetes cluster-hour.
- Developers get a CLI, a Terraform provider, an API and an MCP server for automation.
Cons
- There are few independent user reviews on G2, Capterra or Gartner.
- It has fewer managed services and a narrower geographic footprint than the hyperscalers.
- Self-serve GPU rates on the pricing page are set to rise from December 1, 2026.
- Service terms reportedly exclude HIPAA-regulated workloads.
MWS Cloud
Pros
- It holds Russian compliance certifications, including 152-FZ at UZ-1, GOST R 57580, and PCI DSS 4.0.1.
- It runs on MTS's own data centers and network, with Tier III facilities and a stated 99.95% availability.
- The catalog is broad: managed PostgreSQL, MySQL, ClickHouse, Kafka, Valkey and Kubernetes, plus Object Storage and a CDN.
- Infrastructure can be automated through the API, CLI and Terraform as well as the web console.
- Security services include Anti-DDoS, WAF, KMS, Secret Manager and SOC.
Cons
- A 2025 Habr review found that most platform services were in preview, and Compute had no SLA.
- At review time, onboarding meant a form and a manual approval that could take up to 10 days, and the CDN was available only on request.
- The same review found no NAT gateway, only one storage class, and no automatic issuance of SSL certificates.
- Prices are not shown on the website, and one user comment called VM prices much higher than those of budget VPS hosts.
- Billing at review time had no budget alerts or forecasting.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Crusoe Cloud scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.6/10 against 4.9/10 for MWS Cloud. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 7/10 for Crusoe Cloud and 4/10 for MWS Cloud.
No, neither Crusoe Cloud nor MWS Cloud lists a free plan.
Crusoe Cloud is the better fit for developers: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 5/10 for MWS Cloud.
