b stack radar

Celoxis vs HaloPSA: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of Celoxis and HaloPSA to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

Celoxis logo

Celoxis

6.5/10

Celoxis is project portfolio management software for PMOs and mid-to-large organizations. It covers scheduling, resource capacity, timesheets, project financials and client portals, in the cloud or on-premise.

HaloPSA logo

HaloPSA

7.1/10

Winner

HaloPSA is a professional services automation platform for managed service providers and IT service teams. It combines ticketing, projects, time tracking, billing and reporting.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Celoxis logo
Celoxis
HaloPSA logo
HaloPSA
Scores
Overall Rating6.5/107.1/10
Cost6/105/10
Ease of Use5/105/10
Analytics8/107/10
Customization8/109/10
Scalability8/108/10
Support7/107/10
Integration5/108/10
Security7/109/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid plan$10/user/mo
Core
£66/user/mo
Halo (single plan)
Estimated cost for 10 users$450/mo
Business
Contact for pricing
Features
App integrations
Client collaboration
Dashboards
Reporting
Scheduling
Task management
Time tracking
Collaboration toolsNot listed
File sharingNot listed
Gantt chartsNot listed
Knowledge baseNot listed
Task listsNot listed
Timeline viewNot listed
Workflow automationNot listed

Celoxis vs HaloPSA cost by team size

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Celoxis logo
Why choose Celoxis

  • Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 7/10)
  • Better fit for consultancies (8/10 vs 6/10)

HaloPSA logo
Why choose HaloPSA

  • Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Security score (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Better fit for small business (7/10 vs 4/10)
  • Better fit for it teams (9/10 vs 6/10)

Pros & Cons

Celoxis logo
Celoxis

Pros

  • Dashboards and real-time reporting are the most praised feature in user reviews.
  • It combines scheduling, resource capacity, timesheets, costing and billing in one tool, which suits PMOs.
  • Read-only and client users are free, and the Business plan includes a client portal.
  • It can be deployed on-premise as well as in the cloud, which few competitors offer.
  • Customer queries are answered by engineers rather than scripted agents.

Cons

  • Users describe the interface as cluttered and harder to navigate than it should be.
  • Every plan requires at least five full-access users, and the published prices are annual only.
  • Integrations such as Jira and QuickBooks cost extra below the Enterprise plan.
  • Setting up tasks and recording progress takes noticeable effort, according to reviewers.

HaloPSA logo
HaloPSA

Pros

  • One per-agent plan includes every module and the AI features, with no paid add-ons.
  • Portal customers and end users are free, so client collaboration does not add licence cost.
  • More than 250 integrations, including accounting and RMM tools, are included at no extra charge.
  • Broad compliance coverage includes ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP and HIPAA, plus SSO and audit logs.
  • Reviewers describe the browser interface as modern and fast.

Cons

  • Reviewers say the configuration menus are convoluted, and a consultant is often needed to get the most out of it.
  • A paid onboarding package is mandatory and its price is not published.
  • The project features are oriented toward IT service delivery rather than complex professional services projects.
  • Some users report slowness and weaker calendar, notification and stock-control features.
  • Per-agent costs add up for larger teams.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

HaloPSA scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 7.1/10 against 6.5/10 for Celoxis. The largest gap is in Integration: 5/10 for Celoxis and 8/10 for HaloPSA.

No, neither Celoxis nor HaloPSA lists a free plan.

HaloPSA is the better fit for it teams: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 6/10 for Celoxis.

Related Comparisons