Boond vs TEAMBOX (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Boond is our pick, scoring 6.6/10 against 6.5/10 for TEAMBOX on our CRM criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 6/10). Neither Boond nor TEAMBOX lists a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
Boond
6.6/10
Boond, formerly BoondManager, is a French all-in-one ERP for IT services firms, consultancies and engineering companies, covering CRM, staffing, HR, timesheets, expenses and invoicing.
TEAMBOX
6.5/10
TEAMBOX is cloud ERP for agencies, consultancies and IT service providers in the DACH region. It covers quotes, invoicing, time tracking, resource planning and controlling.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | €59/user/mo Core | €27/user/mo Basic |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | €590/mo Core | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Invoicing | ||
| Expense Management | Not listed | |
| Multi-entity Consolidation | ||
| General Ledger | Not listed | |
| Tax Compliance | ||
| Bank Reconciliation | Not listed | |
| Budgeting and Forecasting | Not listed | |
| Financial Reporting | Not listed | |
| Accounts Payable | Not listed | |
Boond vs TEAMBOX cost by team size
TEAMBOX costs less from 25 users.
| Team size | Boond | TEAMBOX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | €59/moCore | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | €295/moCore | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | €590/moCore | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | €1,475/moCore | €675/moBasic |
| 50 users | €2,950/moCore | €1,350/moBasic |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Boond and TEAMBOX suit
Boond fits consultancies and small business better than TEAMBOX.
| Audience | Boond | TEAMBOX |
|---|---|---|
| Consultancies | 10/10Boond is built specifically for consulting firms and ESNs that place consultants with clients. | 8/10The vendor explicitly targets consultancies, with project controlling and billing of hours. |
| Small Business | 5/10It works for small ESNs, but reviewers call the cost high for very small firms. | 3/10Firms under 15 users are redirected to partner tools such as MOCO. |
| Mid-Market | 8/10Multi-entity support, automations and a dedicated server option suit mid-sized consulting groups. | 7/10The 15-user minimum and the Enterprise multi-tenant option suit mid-sized service firms. |
| IT Teams | 6/10It suits IT services companies, but not internal IT departments. | 6/10IT service providers are a named target group, and the product offers a Jira integration. |
| Agencies | Not rated | 9/10The product is built as agency software, with project budgeting, time tracking and invoicing in one place. |
| Engineering Firms | 8/10The vendor and reviewers name engineering consultancies as a core target. | Not rated |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Boond
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Scalability score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for consultancies (10/10 vs 8/10)
- Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 3/10)
Why choose TEAMBOX
- Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Boond
Pros
- Built specifically for the consultant-placement workflow, from CRM and recruitment through timesheets to invoicing
- Public, transparent per-manager pricing with cheap 4 euro consultant seats
- Open API with a sandbox, Make and Zapier connectors, and an MCP server on higher plans
- ISO 27001 certified
- Strong review scores: 4.7 on Capterra and 4.8 on Appvizer
- Multi-entity administration for consulting groups
Cons
- No full general ledger, only pre-accounting, so a separate accounting tool is needed
- Bank reconciliation and integrated finance require the Advanced plan or higher
- Reviewers say the initial setup takes time and some advanced features are hard to configure
- Reviewers find it expensive for very small firms
- Some users report weak reporting for French research tax credit (CIR) needs
TEAMBOX
Pros
- Reviewers say one system replaces separate tools for projects, time tracking and invoicing.
- Support is rated 97 percent by reviewers on OMR Reviews and described as fast.
- Prices are published per user per month, and no limits are placed on projects, customers or budgets.
- Built-in e-invoicing, QR-code invoices and DATEV or BMD interfaces suit firms in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.
- The Enterprise plan supports multiple companies, internal cost allocation and cross-company reports for agency networks.
Cons
- Reviewers frequently describe the user interface as outdated.
- Reviewers call the mobile view confusing or slow.
- Plans require at least 15 users, so small teams are pointed elsewhere.
- Recurring invoices and OCR are only in Pro, and accounting interfaces cost extra.
- It is not a general ledger, so bookkeeping still needs DATEV or a similar tool.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Boond scores higher on our CRM criteria: 6.6/10 against 6.5/10 for TEAMBOX. The largest gap is in Analytics: 6/10 for Boond and 7/10 for TEAMBOX.
No, neither Boond nor TEAMBOX lists a free plan.
Boond is the better fit for consultancies: we rate it 10/10 for them, against 8/10 for TEAMBOX.
