Bare Metal Solution vs Cherry Servers Comparison
Compare Bare Metal Solution vs Cherry Servers features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Bare Metal Solution
5.6/10
Google Cloud service that provides dedicated, single-tenant physical servers in regional extensions for Oracle and other specialized enterprise workloads, connected to Google Cloud.
Cherry Servers
6.7/10
Lithuanian infrastructure provider renting bare metal dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual servers with hourly billing and API automation to developers and businesses.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | B Bare Metal Solution | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 5.6/10 | 6.7/10 |
| Analytics | 4/10 | 4/10 |
| Cost | 3/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 3/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Automatic Backups | ||
| Dedicated Servers | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
BWhy choose Bare Metal Solution
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Cherry Servers
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 3/10)
- Better fit for startups (7/10 vs 2/10)
- Better fit for small business (4/10 vs 1/10)
Pros & Cons
BBare Metal Solution
Pros
- Single-tenant physical servers let Oracle BYOL be counted on physical cores, with no soft-partitioning risk.
- Low-latency, Google-managed interconnect to Google Cloud services, with no reported same-region transfer charges.
- A wide range of server sizes, including an 8-core option for licence right-sizing and up to 24 TB memory systems.
- A 99.9% uptime SLO per server, with credits of 10% to 50% of the monthly bill when it is missed.
- Available in 12 regions across four continents.
Cons
- No public pricing; every deployment goes through sales on a multi-year subscription.
- Customers handle OS licensing, patching, security and database administration; Google manages only the hardware and network.
- Storage volumes cannot be expanded after provisioning, and jumbo frames are not supported on VLAN attachments.
- Production deployments have historically needed four to eight weeks of lead time.
- Very few public user reviews (G2 lists only 4).
Cherry Servers
Pros
- Hourly, fixed-term and spot billing for bare metal, which is uncommon among dedicated server hosts
- Reviewers repeatedly praise fast responses from human support staff
- Backup storage is free with dedicated servers
- An open-source Terraform provider and REST API support infrastructure-as-code workflows
- Seven or more locations across Europe, the US and Asia
Cons
- The pricing page lists no managed Kubernetes, managed databases or object storage
- Some users report higher-than-expected latency on long-distance network routes
- DDoS protection is only listed as an option for floating IPs
- Server prices are shown hourly, which makes monthly cost comparisons harder
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Cherry Servers scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 6.7/10 against 5.6/10 for Bare Metal Solution. The largest gap is in Cost: 3/10 for Bare Metal Solution and 8/10 for Cherry Servers.
No, neither Bare Metal Solution nor Cherry Servers lists a free plan.
Cherry Servers is the better fit for startups: we rate it 7/10 for them, against 2/10 for Bare Metal Solution.
