Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Cherry Servers Comparison
Compare Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Cherry Servers features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
7.9/10
Amazon's public cloud platform, with over 200 pay-as-you-go services for compute, storage, databases, networking and AI, used by startups through large enterprises and governments.
Cherry Servers
6.7/10
Lithuanian infrastructure provider renting bare metal dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual servers with hourly billing and API automation to developers and businesses.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.9/10 | 6.7/10 |
| Analytics | 8/10 | 4/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 10/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 10/10 | 6/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 6/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free plan | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| VPS Hosting | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Cherry Servers cost by team size
| Team size | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Cherry Servers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree plan | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | FreeFree plan | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | FreeFree plan | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | FreeFree plan | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | FreeFree plan | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Amazon Web Services (AWS)
- Has a free plan (Cherry Servers does not)
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Integration score (10/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Cherry Servers
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 4/10)
Pros & Cons
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Pros
- The service catalogue is unusually broad, with over 200 services across 38 regions, so most infrastructure needs can be met on one platform.
- EC2 has a 99.99% region-level SLA with credits of up to 100%, and instances unavailable for more than six minutes in an hour are not billed for that hour.
- The free plan gives up to $200 in credits, and more than 30 always-free services let new teams experiment at low cost.
- Support scales from a $29 minimum up to dedicated Enterprise and Unified Operations tiers for mission-critical workloads.
- G2 rates it 4.4 across more than 17,000 reviews, and reviewers praise its scalability and global reach.
Cons
- Reviewers widely cite a steep learning curve across the console and services.
- Usage pricing is complex and can produce unexpected bills unless spend is monitored closely.
- Paid support is billed as a percentage of total AWS spend, so support costs rise with usage.
- A July 2025 billing console bug showed customers estimated charges in the billions, which hurt trust in its cost tooling.
Cherry Servers
Pros
- Hourly, fixed-term and spot billing for bare metal, which is uncommon among dedicated server hosts
- Reviewers repeatedly praise fast responses from human support staff
- Backup storage is free with dedicated servers
- An open-source Terraform provider and REST API support infrastructure-as-code workflows
- Seven or more locations across Europe, the US and Asia
Cons
- The pricing page lists no managed Kubernetes, managed databases or object storage
- Some users report higher-than-expected latency on long-distance network routes
- DDoS protection is only listed as an option for floating IPs
- Server prices are shown hourly, which makes monthly cost comparisons harder
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon Web Services (AWS) scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 6.7/10 for Cherry Servers. The largest gap is in Analytics: 8/10 for Amazon Web Services (AWS) and 4/10 for Cherry Servers.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) has a free plan; Cherry Servers does not list one.
