3-GIS vs ArcGIS (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
ArcGIS is our pick, scoring 7.2/10 against 6.4/10 for 3-GIS on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Analytics score (9/10 vs 5/10). Neither 3-GIS nor ArcGIS lists a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026

3-GIS
6.4/10
3-GIS sells GIS-based network management software that telecom operators and electric and gas utilities use to plan, design, record, inspect and maintain fiber and utility networks.

ArcGIS
7.2/10
Esri's GIS platform for mapping, spatial analysis and field data collection, used by utilities, governments and infrastructure owners to manage networks and assets.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.4/10 | 7.2/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 4/10 | 3/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Asset Registry | ||
| GIS and Mapping | ||
| Inspection Checklists | ||
| Offline Field App | ||
| Work Orders | ||
| Engineering Design | Not listed | |
Who 3-GIS and ArcGIS suit
| Audience | 3-GIS | ArcGIS |
|---|---|---|
| Small Business | 3/10Quote-only pricing, implementation services and a reliance on the Esri ecosystem make it heavy for very small operators. | 4/10Reviewers say subscription and credit costs are hard to justify for small users. |
| Enterprise | 8/10The vendor cites deployments with thousands of users and more than 500 million network records, and offers role-based administration and APIs for OSS/BSS integration. | 8/10Large organizations can choose SaaS or self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise. |
| Field Teams | 8/10The Mobile and MIMS apps let crews redline, inspect, take photos and trace outages offline, then sync back to the office. | 8/10Field Maps supports offline task work, data capture and crew dispatch. |
| Utilities | 9/10The utility products cover Esri Utility Network editing, mobile inspections, work management and pole attachment management for electric and gas networks. | 9/10Esri targets utilities with utility network tracing and field crew apps. |
| Energy Companies | 7/10Electric and gas network operators are a stated target market, though the products focus on network records rather than generation assets. | Not rated |
| Engineering Firms | 6/10Fiber design contractors can use the design and work-packet tools, with contractor access managed in Admin. | Not rated |
| Government | Not rated | 9/10Government agencies are a core market for Field Maps and ArcGIS Online. |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose 3-GIS

- Higher Cost score (4/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose ArcGIS

- Higher Analytics score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
3-GIS

Pros
- One web system covers the fiber lifecycle: planning in Prospector, design and work packets, strand-level tracing, and operations reporting.
- The Mobile app supports offline work on iOS and Android, and syncs crew redlines, photos and asset updates back to the central record.
- The utility products build on Esri ArcGIS and Utility Network, which suits utilities already invested in Esri.
- Customers can choose between SaaS and on-premises deployment, and the company displays an ISO 27001 badge from A-LIGN.
- Capterra reviewers praise the support team and the ability to configure the software to their needs, giving customer service a 4.4 sub-score.
Cons
- No public pricing, and implementation and data migration services add to total cost; Capterra users scored value for money at 3.9.
- Capterra reviewers report lag and slow navigation at times.
- Users coming from ArcGIS say they miss some ArcGIS features in the 3-GIS interface.
- Only a handful of independent reviews are public, so peer evidence is limited.
- Few turnkey OMS, ADMS or SCADA connectors are documented; deeper integrations rely on APIs or services.
- The November 2026 acquisition by SAM adds some roadmap uncertainty.
ArcGIS

Pros
- One platform covers desktop, cloud, self-hosted and mobile GIS, so office and field teams work from the same data.
- Field Maps works fully offline for maps, forms, tasks and utility network tracing.
- Integrates with Cityworks, Salesforce, Power Automate and offers APIs for custom systems.
- G2 reviewers praise how it handles layers and datasets and how easy cloud access makes remote work.
Cons
- No public pricing, and reviewers cite subscription and credit costs as the main complaint.
- Credits are consumed by premium services, which can limit heavy use.
- ArcGIS Online lacks some geoprocessing tools found in ArcGIS Pro and Desktop.
- Reviewers report a steep learning curve without training.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
ArcGIS scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 7.2/10 against 6.4/10 for 3-GIS. The largest gap is in Analytics: 5/10 for 3-GIS and 9/10 for ArcGIS.
No, neither 3-GIS nor ArcGIS lists a free plan.



