b stack radar
Meta Llama logo

Meta Llama

5.6/10

Meta's family of open-weight large language models, including Llama 3.x and the multimodal Llama 4, which teams download and run themselves or through third-party hosts.

Data last updated November 2026 · Our methodology

Overview

Meta Llama is a family of open-weight large language models that Meta released between February 2023 and April 2025. The current lineup is Llama 2, Llama 3 (3.1, 3.2 and 3.3) and Llama 4. Llama 4 Scout (109B total parameters, 17B active, 10M-token context) and Llama 4 Maverick (400B total, 1M context) are mixture-of-experts models that accept images as well as text. Organisations download the weights from Hugging Face or Kaggle under Meta's community licenses, then fine-tune and host them on their own hardware or through providers such as Groq, Together AI, Microsoft Foundry and Amazon Bedrock. Meta charges nothing for the weights. Companies whose products exceed 700 million monthly active users need a separate license, and the Llama 4 license excludes companies based in the EU. Your real cost is compute, or per-token fees from whichever host you choose. Llama suits developer and IT teams that need a model they can host privately and customise, with no per-seat fees. The main limitation is that the line has effectively stopped moving forward. In April 2026 Meta switched its own products to the proprietary Muse Spark model and said only that existing Llama models would stay available. It retired the Llama API preview on July 6, 2026. Cloud hosts are also winding Llama down: Google Cloud retired its managed Llama 3.3 API in October 2026, and Bedrock lists Llama models as legacy with an end-of-life date of March 2027. Reviewers had already found Llama 4 behind rivals such as DeepSeek V3 on coding benchmarks at launch.

Our Rating

5.6
out of 10
Integration
6
Analytics
1
Customization
9
Ease of Use
3
Support
2
Cost
9
Scalability
6
Security
6
Output Quality
5

Who Meta Llama is best for

Best software for Developers

Good fit

  • Open weights, broad tooling support and fine-tuning freedom suit engineers building their own AI applications, though the models are aging.

Less suited

  • IT teams can self-host the models for full data control, but they carry the infrastructure work and get no vendor support.

  • No license fees and cheap third-party hosting help startups on a budget, but newer open models often perform better.

  • Self-hosting gives data control, but there is no enterprise support, the 700M MAU clause and EU exclusion apply, and cloud providers are retiring Llama endpoints.

  • Llama is a raw model with no ready-made app or admin tools, so non-technical small businesses get little from it directly.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • The weights are free to download and use commercially, so self-hosting avoids per-seat and per-token fees from the model vendor.
  • Open weights allow full fine-tuning and private deployment, which keeps sensitive data on your own infrastructure.
  • The range of sizes, from the 1B and 3B Llama 3.2 models to the 400B Llama 4 Maverick, covers uses from edge devices to multi-GPU servers.
  • Llama 4 Scout advertises a 10M-token context window, and both Llama 4 models accept image input.
  • Many hosts serve Llama cheaply. Recent third-party trackers list Llama 4 Maverick at around $0.15 to $0.50 per million input tokens on providers such as DeepInfra and Groq.
  • Meta publishes companion safety models such as Llama Guard 4 and Prompt Guard for filtering inputs and outputs.

Cons

  • Meta moved its own products to the proprietary Muse models in April 2026 and has announced no new Llama releases, so the line is effectively frozen at Llama 4 from April 2025.
  • Meta retired the Llama API preview on July 6, 2026, and providers are dropping Llama: Google Cloud retired its managed Llama 3.3 API in October 2026, and Bedrock marks Llama as legacy with end of life on March 30, 2027.
  • The Llama 4 license bars companies based in the EU from using the multimodal models, and companies above 700 million monthly active users need Meta's permission.
  • Independent testing found Llama 4 Maverick scored 16% on the aider polyglot coding benchmark, behind DeepSeek V3, and critics accused Meta of using a tuned model for its LMArena results.
  • G2 reviewers most often complain about limited capabilities in specific use cases, slow code generation and repetitive responses.
  • There is no first-party support, admin console or analytics, so teams must build monitoring and governance themselves.

Key Features

Custom Model Training
Private Deployment
Text Generation
Code Generation

Not included

  • Image Generation
  • API Access

Meta Llama Pricing

Open weights (Llama Community License)

Free
  • Commercial use allowed under the community license
  • Llama 4 license excludes companies based in the EU
  • Derivative distributions must carry Built with Llama branding
  • Separate license needed above 700 million monthly active users
  • Hosting and compute costs are paid by the user or to a third-party provider
  • Download Llama 2, 3.x and 4 weights via Hugging Face or Kaggle after accepting the license
Start Free
Open interactive pricing calculatorGet a tailored cost breakdown for your team size, billing cycle, and add‑ons.

Frequently Asked Questions

Meta has not released a new Llama model since Llama 4 in April 2025. In April 2026 it launched the proprietary Muse Spark and moved its own products to Muse. A Meta spokesperson said current Llama models will stay available as open source but gave no commitment to future Llama versions.

No longer. Meta shut down the Llama API public preview on July 6, 2026 and told developers to move to third-party providers. Meta's current Model API serves Muse models, not Llama.

Meta charges nothing for the weights under its community license. You pay for your own GPUs or for per-token fees from a hosting provider. Recent third-party price trackers list Llama 4 Maverick at around $0.50 input and $0.77 output per million tokens on Groq.

The Llama 4 Community License excludes companies and individuals domiciled in the EU from the multimodal Llama 4 models. Llama 3.x models such as Llama 3.3 70B are still licensed for EU use.

Commercial use is allowed. Organisations whose products exceed 700 million monthly active users must request a separate license, which Meta can grant or refuse. Derivative distributions must show Built with Llama branding. The Open Source Initiative does not consider these licenses open source.

The weights are on Hugging Face under the meta-llama organisation, which lists 70 models, and on Kaggle, once you accept the license. Hosted options include Groq, Together AI, DeepInfra, Microsoft Foundry and Amazon Bedrock, though some clouds are deprecating Llama endpoints.

Meta says Llama 4 Scout can run on a single Nvidia H100 GPU with quantisation. Maverick needs an H100 DGX system or equivalent multi-GPU setup. The smaller Llama 3.2 models run with roughly 4 to 24 GB of memory.

Ranked near Meta Llama in AI Software

See Meta Llama in the list

Meta Llama is #320 in AI Software by our score.

  1. #317
    Search Atlas logo
    Search Atlas
  2. #318
    vHive logo
    vHive
  3. #319
    Mighty Networks logo
    Mighty Networks
  4. #321
    Kuberns logo
    Kuberns
  5. #322
    Sharper Shape logo
    Sharper Shape
  6. #323
    AppCard logo
    AppCard