Sitemark vs Skycatch (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Sitemark is our pick, scoring 5.9/10 against 5/10 for Skycatch on our AI Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Support score (8/10 vs 5/10). Neither Sitemark nor Skycatch lists a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
Sitemark
5.9/10
Sitemark is a cloud platform for solar, battery storage and grid sites that combines drone and AI inspections, construction tracking and O&M work management.
Skycatch
5/10
Skycatch automates drone capture of mine and heavy construction sites and turns the imagery into high-precision 3D maps, point clouds and digital twins.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 5.9/10 | 5/10 |
| Integration | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 3/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| GIS and Mapping | ||
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
| Digital Twin | ||
| Drone Inspection | ||
| Inspection Automation | ||
| Inspection Checklists | Not listed | |
| Asset Registry | Not listed | |
| LiDAR Processing | Not listed | |
Who Sitemark and Skycatch suit
Sitemark fits drone service providers better than Skycatch.
| Audience | Sitemark | Skycatch |
|---|---|---|
| Drone Service Providers | 8/10Sitemark explicitly targets drone service providers and runs a partner network for data capture. | 5/10Partners such as DroneHive resold the High Precision Package, but the product is built around enterprise site owners. |
| Construction | 7/10EPC contractors get progress tracking, quality control and commissioning tools for solar builds. | 7/10Komatsu distributed it for Smart Construction earthworks sites, though the recent focus has moved to mining. |
| Energy Companies | 9/10The platform is built for solar and battery storage asset owners, and its named customers include TotalEnergies, EDF and Enel. | Not rated |
| Enterprise | Not rated | 9/10Sold as an enterprise package to large miners such as Anglo American and Teck, and now part of Caterpillar. |
| Maintenance Teams | 7/10O&M teams can turn inspection findings into tickets and work orders and track them to completion. | Not rated |
| Operations Teams | Not rated | 7/10Mine operations teams use the near-real-time terrain and haul road analytics for planning and safety. |
| Small Business | Not rated | 2/10There is no self-serve or public pricing, and the hardware bundle approach does not suit small firms. |
| Utilities | 6/10Grid and storage projects are supported, but the product is centred on solar PV. | Not rated |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Sitemark
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for drone service providers (8/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Skycatch
- Higher Integration score (5/10 vs 4/10)
Pros & Cons
Sitemark
Pros
- One platform covers the solar lifecycle, from construction progress and commissioning through thermography inspections and O&M work orders.
- Users on G2 and Capterra mainly praise the easy interface and quick support responses, with ratings around 4.8 on G2 and 5.0 on Capterra.
- Flexible data capture: teams can fly their own drones or order flights through Sitemark's partner network.
- Large installed base, with a claimed 1,300+ companies and 15,000+ sites across 100+ countries.
Cons
- No public pricing, so every buyer has to go through a quote or demo.
- The product is narrowly focused on solar and renewables and is not a general CMMS for other asset types.
- Integration and API details are not public, and SourceForge lists no API.
- Review volume is small: about 28 reviews on G2 and 5 on Capterra.
Skycatch
Pros
- Built specifically for mining workflows such as highwall scanning, tailings inspection, bench toe and crest mapping, and haul road analysis.
- The Edge1 base station lets crews process maps at remote sites within minutes instead of waiting for cloud uploads.
- Claims sub-3 cm accuracy and 10 to 15 minute cloud processing for M300-based capture.
- Proven at large scale, with Komatsu ordering a fleet of 1,000 drones and miners such as Anglo American and Teck as cited users.
- Caterpillar ownership means planned integration with MineStar and RPMGlobal mine planning software.
Cons
- No public pricing or self-serve plans, and the product is sold as a hardware and software bundle.
- Since the July 2026 Caterpillar acquisition, skycatch.com redirects to an acquisition notice, so there are no public product or documentation pages.
- Independent user reviews are very scarce: G2 shows only about three reviews and an inactive profile.
- Tied mainly to DJI and its own aircraft, and aggregator listings show few third-party integrations and no public API.
- One G2 reviewer noted the product is limited relative to its potential.
Not sold on either?
Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Sitemark scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 5.9/10 against 5/10 for Skycatch. The largest gap is in Support: 8/10 for Sitemark and 5/10 for Skycatch.
No, neither Sitemark nor Skycatch lists a free plan.
Sitemark is the better fit for drone service providers: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 5/10 for Skycatch.
