Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public) vs Red Hat OpenShift (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Red Hat OpenShift is our pick, scoring 7.2/10 against 6.6/10 for Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public) on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (8/10 vs 6/10). Only Red Hat OpenShift has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026

Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public)
6.6/10
OpenStack-based sovereign public cloud from T-Systems offering pay-per-use IaaS and PaaS from German and Dutch data centers for regulated European organisations.

Red Hat OpenShift
7.2/10
Enterprise Kubernetes application platform from Red Hat, offered as self-managed software or as managed services on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and IBM Cloud.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 7.2/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 3/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Free Developer Sandbox |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Serverless Functions | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Git Deployments | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public) vs Red Hat OpenShift cost by team size
| Team size | Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public) | Red Hat OpenShift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | FreeDeveloper Sandbox |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | FreeDeveloper Sandbox |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | FreeDeveloper Sandbox |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | FreeDeveloper Sandbox |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | FreeDeveloper Sandbox |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public) and Red Hat OpenShift suit
| Audience | Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public) | Red Hat OpenShift |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | 8/10It has about 4,000 customers and includes managed services and consulting from T-Systems. | 9/10Hybrid-cloud scope, compliance attestations and around-the-clock SRE-run managed options are aimed squarely at large organisations. |
| Government | 9/10Reviewers highlight BSI C5 compliance and German operation as a fit for public sector bodies. | 8/10Sources cite certifications for government as a main buying reason, and Red Hat documents ROSA on AWS GovCloud. |
| Healthcare | 8/10Reviewers recommend it for organisations that handle patient data and need EU-only hosting. | 7/10OpenShift Dedicated lists HIPAA among its compliance attestations. |
| Startups | 4/10Reviewers point cost-sensitive, developer-experience-focused teams to Hetzner or Scaleway instead. | 3/10Per-vCPU licensing on top of cloud infrastructure and the complexity of running it make it heavy for small teams. |
| Financial Services | 8/10It explicitly supports DORA and is suited to firms under BaFin oversight. | 8/10Sources describe regulated industries as the usual reason teams choose OpenShift, and Dedicated lists PCI DSS and SOC 2. |
| Developers | Not rated | 6/10A developer console, pipelines and a free Developer Sandbox help developers, but reviewers report a steep learning curve. |
| IT Teams | Not rated | 8/10Platform and operations teams get automated upgrades through Operators, multi-cluster management in Platform Plus, and VM support in the same platform. |
| Small Business | Not rated | 2/10Costs and the operational skills needed are out of proportion for small workloads. |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public)

- Higher Cost score (5/10 vs 3/10)
Why choose Red Hat OpenShift

- Has a free plan (Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public) does not)
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Scalability score (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public)

Pros
- Strong compliance profile, with BSI C5, ISO 27001/27018 and SOC certifications and explicit DORA and NIS2 support
- Operated by a German company in EU data centers, with no US jurisdiction exposure
- OpenStack base and an official Terraform provider reduce proprietary lock-in
- 24/7 expert hotline and email support are included in the price
- 250 euro starting credit and a free cost dashboard make evaluation easier
Cons
- Reviewers estimate about 80 percent feature parity with AWS, with gaps in managed AI and serverless
- Only Germany and the Netherlands as main regions, with no global footprint
- Console usability and documentation are rated below DigitalOcean and Scaleway
- Simple compute costs more than budget EU providers such as Hetzner or OVHcloud
Red Hat OpenShift

Pros
- The same platform runs self-managed on premises and as a managed service on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and IBM Cloud, so hybrid estates can standardise on it.
- The managed services are run by Red Hat SREs around the clock, carry a 99.95% SLA, and are billed on the cloud provider's invoice, where the spend can count toward committed-spend discounts.
- Strong security defaults and compliance coverage. Dedicated lists HIPAA, ISO 27001/27017/27018, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type 2 and SOC 3, and Reddit users credit its secure defaults.
- Pipelines, GitOps, Serverless, Service Mesh, a registry and VM support come built in, which saves assembling a separate toolchain on vanilla Kubernetes.
- Clusters can be automated through the rosa and oc CLIs, a Red Hat Terraform provider and Operators that handle automated upgrades.
- Reviews are high, at about 4.5 on G2 from roughly 300 reviews and 9.1 out of 10 on TrustRadius.
Cons
- Self-managed editions have no public prices, and per-vCPU licensing can exceed the cost of the underlying compute, according to reviewers and competitor analyses.
- The managed service fees come on top of separate cloud infrastructure charges, which makes the total cost harder to predict.
- G2 and TrustRadius reviewers describe a steep learning curve and complex initial setup.
- OpenShift-specific concepts such as Security Context Constraints and the Red Hat stack can make moving away from the platform difficult.
- It is too heavy and expensive for small teams or simple web hosting needs.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Red Hat OpenShift scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.2/10 against 6.6/10 for Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public). The largest gap is in Cost: 5/10 for Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public) and 3/10 for Red Hat OpenShift.
Red Hat OpenShift has a free plan; Open Telekom Cloud (T Cloud Public) does not list one.
Related Comparisons









