Miro vs Planview AdaptiveWork: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Miro and Planview AdaptiveWork to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Miro
7/10
Miro is a visual collaboration workspace with an infinite whiteboard, docs, tables, and Kanban boards, which teams use to plan projects, run workshops, and map workflows.
Planview AdaptiveWork
6.6/10
Enterprise project and portfolio management platform, formerly Clarizen, for PMOs and professional services teams that need resource, financial and portfolio control.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Integration | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Analytics | 4/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 3/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $10/user/mo Starter | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Docs | Not listed | |
| Spreadsheet interface | Not listed | |
| Client collaboration | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Kanban boards | ||
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Whiteboards | Not listed | |
| File sharing | Not listed | |
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Gantt charts | Not listed | |
| Timeline view | Not listed | |
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Time tracking | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | Not listed | |
| Dashboards | Not listed | |
| Reporting | Not listed | |
| Goals and OKRs | Not listed | |
Miro vs Planview AdaptiveWork cost by team size
| Team size | Miro | Planview AdaptiveWork |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | FreeFree | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Miro
- Has a free plan (Planview AdaptiveWork does not)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 3/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 2/10)
- Better fit for small business (7/10 vs 3/10)
Why choose Planview AdaptiveWork
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Miro
Pros
- Real-time collaboration on an infinite canvas, with many templates for workshops, roadmaps, and diagrams.
- Reviewers say teammates with little project-management experience pick up the basics quickly.
- Business includes two-way sync with Jira, Asana, Linear, ClickUp, and Azure DevOps.
- Strong security credentials, including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, SSO, and data residency on Enterprise.
- Free plan allows unlimited members, and Starter costs $8 per member per month on annual billing.
Cons
- Very large boards can feel cluttered and hard to navigate.
- Advanced workflows, integrations, and automation take time to learn.
- Sonary rates support at 2.5 out of 5, and 24/7 support is a paid Enterprise add-on.
- It does not work offline.
- It lacks the deep task tracking and reporting of a dedicated project management tool, so it is often used alongside one.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Pros
- Deep customization, including custom objects and fields, dependent picklists and custom workflow actions.
- Reviewers single out reporting as a strength, and Slide Publisher automates PowerPoint status decks.
- Professional services financials, including rate cards, billable time, utilization and revenue forecasting, are built in.
- An External Collaborator portal gives clients access to projects, files and requests.
- It has a broad set of enterprise connectors, including Jira, Salesforce, ServiceNow, SAP and Microsoft Teams.
Cons
- No public pricing, and reviewers frequently call it expensive compared with similar tools.
- There is a steep learning curve, and some users find it overwhelming at first.
- Heavy customization can slow performance, especially over a VPN.
- Reviewers report mixed support, with slower resolution of complex issues.
- There is no separate development environment for testing workflows against live data.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Miro scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7/10 against 6.6/10 for Planview AdaptiveWork. The largest gap is in Analytics: 4/10 for Miro and 8/10 for Planview AdaptiveWork.
Miro has a free plan; Planview AdaptiveWork does not list one.
Miro is the better fit for startups: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 2/10 for Planview AdaptiveWork.
