Latitude.sh vs phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Latitude.sh and phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Latitude.sh
6.9/10
Bare metal cloud provider that offers dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual machines on demand, billed hourly or monthly, for developers and infrastructure-heavy businesses.
phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
6.6/10
API-driven single-tenant bare metal servers that deploy in minutes, billed hourly or reserved, for developers and IT teams that need dedicated hardware with cloud-style automation.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | P phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.9/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro | $39/mo General Purpose (from s0.d1.small) |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro | $39/mo General Purpose (from s0.d1.small) |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| DDoS Protection | ||
| Dedicated Servers | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
Latitude.sh vs phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud cost by team size
Latitude.sh costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Latitude.sh | phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $39/moGeneral Purpose (from s0.d1.small) |
| 5 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $39/moGeneral Purpose (from s0.d1.small) |
| 10 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $39/moGeneral Purpose (from s0.d1.small) |
| 25 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $39/moGeneral Purpose (from s0.d1.small) |
| 50 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $39/moGeneral Purpose (from s0.d1.small) |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Latitude.sh
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: $18/mo vs $39/mo
- Higher Analytics score (5/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 5/10)
PWhy choose phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Latitude.sh
Pros
- Prices for every metal, GPU and VM plan are listed publicly, with hourly rates as well as monthly ones.
- Each listed plan includes 20 TB of outbound bandwidth, and inbound traffic is unlimited.
- Servers are offered in 26 locations, including several in Latin America such as Sao Paulo, Bogota, Santiago, Buenos Aires and Mexico City.
- Servers can be automated through the API, SDKs, CLI and a Terraform provider.
- Current-generation AMD EPYC hardware runs alongside B300, RTX PRO 6000 and H100 GPU options.
Cons
- There is no managed WordPress, managed database or serverless offering, so you need operations expertise.
- Independent user reviews are scarce, and PeerSpot shows no reviews at all.
- Bandwidth overage rates and storage prices are not shown on the main pricing page.
- The Megaport acquisition may change the roadmap over time, although Latitude.sh says the brand and billing stay the same.
PphoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
Pros
- Servers can be deployed in minutes through the web portal, the REST API, the pnapctl CLI, or Terraform, according to vendor pages and ServeTheHome's hands-on test.
- Hourly billing lets you tear servers down at any time, and reservations cut costs by up to 30 percent.
- A broad catalog includes Xeon 6, ARM, GPU, and Pliops database instances.
- A first deployment includes 15 TB of bandwidth, which servers in the same location can share.
- The portal gives direct iKVM console access for recovering servers that stop responding.
Cons
- Servers are unmanaged by default, so you handle the OS, patches, and security.
- Only six locations are listed, fewer than at the large hyperscalers.
- Pricing is higher than at budget dedicated hosts, because you pay for the automation layer.
- There are few user reviews on G2 and similar sites, and one user reported that billing setup took several attempts.
- No SLA terms were found for Bare Metal Cloud. Third-party listings cite both a 100 percent and a 99.9 percent uptime guarantee.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Latitude.sh scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 6.9/10 against 6.6/10 for phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud. The largest gap is in Analytics: 5/10 for Latitude.sh and 4/10 for phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud.
Latitude.sh costs less for 10 users: about $18/mo on its Virtual Machine vm.micro plan, against about $39/mo on its General Purpose (from s0.d1.small) plan for phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud, billed monthly.
No, neither Latitude.sh nor phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud lists a free plan.
